Why Is Chaos Deterministic and Not Random?

Click For Summary
Chaos is a deterministic behavior characterized by sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where minor changes can lead to vastly different outcomes. It exists between predictable (linear) and random (nonlinear) systems, providing a defined envelope of motion within which chaotic behavior occurs. While chaotic systems may exhibit unpredictable trajectories, they remain bound by certain limits, unlike random systems that lack such constraints. An example is a building swaying in the wind; small winds cause predictable sway, while larger winds lead to chaotic motion within engineering limits, and extreme winds can push the system into randomness, potentially causing failure. Ultimately, chaos is not random because it can be modeled by non-linear formulas, maintaining a structured behavior despite its unpredictability.
student-engineer
Chaos is deterministic behavior.Why is chaos deterministic.Why chaos is not random.
Chaos is sensitive dependence on initial conditions,a slight change in initial condition can give rise to totally different trajectories.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Systems have three modes of operation:
- predictable (linear)
- chaotic (nonlinear)
- random (random)

Chaos appears between the predictable mode and the random mode. In a sense, chaos provides a wider envelope of motion for a system where we can't predict the motion but we know the motion won't go outside the envelope either. Also in chaotic systems we may see patterns that appear for a time and then new patterns emerge.

Buildings sway in any wind. For small winds, the sway is pretty linear, pretty predictable. For larger winds, the sway becomes chaotic, not predictable but within the engineering limits (envelope of motion) of the building. For really large winds, the building may be driven beyond chaotic to random and then failure occurs and the building collapses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

Chaos vs Random

http://faculty.rhodes.edu/wetzel/random/level23intro.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness
 
  • Like
Likes student-engineer
jedishrfu said:
Systems have three modes of operation:
- predictable (linear)
- chaotic (nonlinear)
- random (random)

Chaos appears between the predictable mode and the random mode. In a sense, chaos provides a wider envelope of motion for a system where we can't predict the motion but we know the motion won't go outside the envelope either. Also in chaotic systems we may see patterns that appear for a time and then new patterns emerge.

Buildings sway in any wind. For small winds, the sway is pretty linear, pretty predictable. For larger winds, the sway becomes chaotic, not predictable but within the engineering limits (envelope of motion) of the building. For really large winds, the building may be driven beyond chaotic to random and then failure occurs and the building collapses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

Chaos vs Random

http://faculty.rhodes.edu/wetzel/random/level23intro.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness
Random is something which is not predictable.Chaotic trajectories are also not predictable,so why is chaos not random.

In the article http://faculty.rhodes.edu/wetzel/random/level23intro.html it is also mentioned,' Chaos theory has shown that deterministic systems can produce results which are chaotic and appear to be random. But they are not technically random because the events can be modeled by a (non-linear) formula.'
Is this the reason
 
The chaotic trajectory isn't predictable over a longer period of time but it still operates in a given envelope of motion whereas random motion has no such envelope. Think of the building example I gave.
 
  • Like
Likes student-engineer
lorenz3d.gif


The picture is an example of chaotic behavior. We can't predict the exact path in the future, but it is also clear from the picture that the behavior is not random. Below is an example of random.

run.gif
 

Attachments

  • lorenz3d.gif
    lorenz3d.gif
    46.3 KB · Views: 1,110
  • run.gif
    run.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 1,027
  • Like
Likes student-engineer and jedishrfu
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K