Why is Cherenkov radiation blue? And what about refractive index?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of Cherenkov radiation, specifically addressing why it appears blue and the role of refractive index in this context. Participants explore theoretical aspects, material properties, and potential applications related to Cherenkov radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains that Cherenkov radiation appears blue due to high energy photons traveling as waves with high frequencies and short wavelengths, which are associated with blue and violet colors.
  • Another participant references the Frank-Tamm formula, suggesting that the intensity of Cherenkov radiation is proportional to frequency, thus supporting the observation of brilliant blue light.
  • Concerns are raised about the possibility of materials that could "push red" light in Cherenkov radiation, questioning if any materials exist that would alter the typical blue appearance.
  • One participant introduces the concept of negative dispersion and its relation to absorption bands, questioning the conditions under which a material could be transparent to certain wavelengths while having a lower refractive index for others.
  • A different viewpoint is presented, stating that Cherenkov radiation is primarily ultraviolet rather than blue, noting practical limitations on energy distribution at very short wavelengths.
  • Another participant mentions the idea of using the moon as a neutrino detector, suggesting a connection to the Cherenkov spectrum and encouraging experimentation with different refractive indices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the color of Cherenkov radiation, with some asserting it is blue while others argue it is primarily ultraviolet. There is no consensus on the existence of materials that could produce different colors of Cherenkov radiation or the implications of negative dispersion.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions regarding the refractive index and absorption characteristics of materials, as well as the limitations of energy distribution in relation to wavelength. These factors remain unresolved within the discussion.

.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,909
Reaction score
1,961
TL;DR
The exact color of Cherenkov radiation is a function of the transparent material used.
For any wavelength, the relative intensity is dependent on refractive index (and more).
Can it be anything other than bright blue? Any neat experiments?
I got this question from my son last night.

If you Google "Why is Cherenkov radiation blue", you get this:
Due to the high energies at play during Cherenkov radiation, the photons travel as waves that have high frequencies and short wavelengths, which are typical of violet and blue colours. The higher the frequencies and the shorter the wavelengths are, the bluer or more violet the light appears to the human eye.

Somewhat more substantial is the Wiki article on the Frank-Tamm formula.
That formula ties the Cherenkov radiation wavelengths to the transmission characteristics at any specified wavelength - and specifically to the refractive index. It also states:
The relative intensity of one frequency is approximately proportional to the frequency. That is, higher frequencies (shorter wavelengths) are more intense in Cherenkov radiation. This is why visible Cherenkov radiation is observed to be brilliant blue.

In general, a transparent material will respond to shorter wavelengths with a higher index of refraction - and thus more Cherenkov. So blue energy is pushed by both the higher energy per photon and the higher refractive index.

My first thought was that perhaps either of the two components of an achromatic lens (flint glass and crown glass) would provide an example of a material where the index of refraction decreases at with shorter wavelengths - but I suspect I am wrong. From what I read, they may create achromatic results even though both would "push blue".

Are there any materials that would "push red" and are there any that would push it enough to make the Cherenkov radiation look something other than blue?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith and vanhees71
Science news on Phys.org
I think that actual negative dispersion is confined to bands of strong absorption. Which means that if a particle travels in a medium which is opaque to blue light, it is possible that blue Cherenkov photons are not just emitted and promptly absorbed but never emitted in the first place.
How wide do absorption bands need to be in order to produce negative dispersion? Can you have a material which is transparent to red, opaque to green and again fairly transparent to blue - but with a smaller refractory index than in red?
 
It's not blue. It's mostly ultraviolet. Does that help?

In principle, the energy distribution is propoprtional to the frerquency. In practice, this cuts off once the wavelength gets below the atomic scale and "speed of light in the material" ceases to have meaning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
31K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K