Chemistry Why is ethanol considered the parent chain in naming this benzene derivative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jolly_math
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Benzene Derivative
AI Thread Summary
In the naming of the molecule 1‐(3‐nitrophenyl)ethanol, ethanol is considered the parent chain because it has the highest priority due to the presence of the hydroxyl (OH) group. The oxygen in the ethyl group elevates its priority over the phenyl group. If the hydroxyl group were replaced with a hydrogen atom, the compound would be named 3-ethyl nitromethane, indicating a shift in priority. Conversely, if one carbon is removed from the ethyl group, the molecule would be referred to as 3-nitrotoluene. This clarification highlights the importance of functional groups in determining parent chain status in organic nomenclature.
jolly_math
Messages
51
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Name the following molecule (below)
Relevant Equations
naming
1670911286423.png

The name of this molecule is 1‐(3‐nitrophenyl)ethanol. I'm confused why ethanol is treated as the parent chain in this case, not the phenyl group. If the ring is composed of more atoms, should it be the parent chain?
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because ethanol is the highest priority group.
 
  • Like
Likes jolly_math and DrClaude
To help make it clear, it's the oxygen on the ethyl group that gives it the priority. Replace the OH with H and it becomes 3 ethyl nitromethane. On the other hand, lose a carbon at the ethyl and it becomes 3 nitrotoluene, so hopefully that clears everything up!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top