Why is fire considered a chemical reaction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter losang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of fire as a chemical reaction, exploring the philosophical implications of scientific understanding and the distinction between physics and philosophy. Participants engage in a debate about the clarity and depth of scientific knowledge, particularly in relation to quantum mechanics and the interpretation of phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Philosophical exploration
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the sensation of burning does not equate to an actual chemical reaction, suggesting a need for precision in scientific language.
  • Others propose that the investigation of smaller scales in science does not necessarily lead to clearer understanding, citing quantum mechanics as an example of increasing confusion with deeper inquiry.
  • A participant challenges the notion that difficulties in understanding indicate a lack of real knowledge, suggesting instead that they reflect intuitive failings.
  • There is a discussion about the historical context of scientific ideas, with some asserting that non-modern thinkers had valid insights that modern science has only recently validated.
  • Participants express differing views on the distinction between physics and philosophy, with some insisting that such a distinction is important for maintaining clarity in discussions.
  • One participant criticizes another for relying on established philosophers like Popper without demonstrating independent thought.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the relationship between physics and philosophy, the clarity of scientific knowledge, and the implications of investigating phenomena at different scales. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of scientific terminology, the subjective nature of understanding in science, and the philosophical implications of scientific inquiry that are not universally accepted.

  • #31
Originally posted by losang
Sort of unrelated to the topic of fire. I considered your alegation that I am this tenzin person by looking at what he wrote. I must say I wish I was this person. What he wrote was really a stroke of insight. I think if this person was still here I would have someone with whom I could engage in very enjoyable conversations with.

I am sorry he is gone.

OMG. Now it is obvious. Heh, smart move.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #32


Originally posted by losang
If you pour dust into the ear of a donkey he makes the sound 'kur kur kur'. If you pour gold dust into the ear of a donkey he makes the same sound.
Fire is a virus and it has infected this thread.
 
  • #33
Response overload! :p

But I know that these people won't get an answer in the near future.
 

Similar threads

What influences ignition temperature and oxygen consumption
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
High School Can a Fire Tornado Flip an 8 Ton Truck?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Can I use a Stirling generator to make electricity from our wood fired stove?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Why do atoms want to complete their shells?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Thermodynamics of a Fire Resistant Safe
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Undergrad Prof Mike Wiest's proposed link between quantum and consciousness
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Undergrad Why is Photon Energy Quantized in Terms of Sine Wave Frequency?
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
Chemically regenerating my auto's catalytic converter?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
Other Books about interpretation and philosophy of physics
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Looking to start a new career in physics, need some advice
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K