Why is HCP more common than FCC in elemental compositions?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gibbo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Fcc
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Hexagonal Close Packed (HCP) structures are more prevalent in elemental compositions compared to Face Centered Cubic (FCC) despite both having the same packing fraction of 74%. This trend is particularly evident in the Lanthanoids and Actinoids, which predominantly exhibit HCP structures. Excluding these groups, the distribution of HCP and FCC elements is nearly equal, indicating that the preference for HCP in certain elements may be influenced by quantum mechanical factors rather than simple geometric considerations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of crystal lattice structures, specifically HCP and FCC.
  • Familiarity with packing fractions and their significance in crystallography.
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics as it relates to atomic structure.
  • Awareness of the periodic table, particularly the properties of Lanthanoids and Actinoids.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the quantum mechanical principles influencing atomic packing in solids.
  • Study the crystallographic properties of Lanthanoids and Actinoids in detail.
  • Explore the implications of packing efficiency on material properties.
  • Investigate other crystal structures and their prevalence in elemental compositions.
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, physicists, and chemists interested in the structural properties of elements and the underlying quantum mechanics that dictate their arrangements.

gibbo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This may be obvious but since the packing fraction for both hexagonal close packed and face centered cubic is the same (74% i believe) why is HCP more common in elemental compositions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I don't really know, but I noticed that a lot of the Lanthanoids and Actinoids are HCP, and if you exclude those two sections, the number of HCP and FCC elements are almost the same.

This is the sort of question that I doubt there is an intuitive answer to...it's all quantum mechanics!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K