Why is i^i equal to a real number?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Max cohen
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
19 replies · 5K views
Max cohen
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Take euler's formula for the identity of complex numbers:

[itex]e^{xi}=cos(x)+sin(x)i[/itex]

If we substitute the value [itex]\pi[/itex] for x it turns out that

[itex]e^{i\pi}=-1[/itex]

most of us already knew this wonderfull trick.

BUT if we substitute [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] for x we get (because cos pi/2 = 0 and sin pi/2 = 1):
[itex]e^{\frac{\pi}{2}i}=i[/itex]

Now if you raise both sides of this identity to the power i, you obtain (since i^2 = -1):

[itex]e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}=i^i[/itex]

Calculating the value of [itex]e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}[/itex] it turns out that

[itex]i^i=0,2078795763...[/itex]

Isn't that just the weirdest thing ever?? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's just the principal value. There are an infinite number of values for the expression i^i, all real.

The general form is given by :

[tex]i^i = e^{-\frac{1}{2}(2k + 1)\pi}[/tex], where k ranges over all integers. The principal value is for zero k.
 
are you sure of that formula? try k=1.
 
Curious3141 said:
That's just the principal value. There are an infinite number of values for the expression i^i, all real.

The general form is given by :
[tex]i^i = e^{-\frac{1}{2}(2k + 1)\pi}[/tex], where k ranges over all integers. The principal value is for zero k.
:-p

I think you mean:

[tex]i^i = e^{-\frac{1}{2}(k + 1)\pi}[/tex]

since it works for every k*(pi/2) with zero k beeing the principal value if I'm correct
 
Sorry, I was wrong. The general form should be [tex]i^i = e^{-\frac{1}{2}\pi(4k + 1)}[/tex].
 
dextercioby said:
Nope,it can't be that one.

Daniel.

Why not ?

k = 0, obvious.

k = 1, exp (-5pi/2) = z.

z^(-i) = exp(5*i*pi/2) = exp(i*pi/2 + 2*i*pi) = i

and so forth.
 
Last edited:
Curious3141 said:
Sorry, I was wrong. The general form should be [tex]i^i = e^{-\frac{1}{2}\pi(4k + 1)}[/tex].

Alright

You said (see above)

[tex]i^{i}=e^{-\frac{1}{2}\pi(4k+1)}[/tex]

I say

[tex]k=0[/tex] (1)

[tex]\mathbb{R}\ni i^{i}=e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}[/tex] (2)

[tex]k=1[/tex] (3)

[tex]\mathbb{R}\ni i^{i}=e^{-\frac{5\pi}{2}}\neq e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}\substack{(2)\\\displaystyle{=}} i^{i}\in\mathbb{R}[/tex] (4)

Do you see something fishy...? :rolleyes: You're working with very real numbers...No more multivalued functions...

Daniel.
 
Okay,now here's what u and Max Cohen wanted to write.

[tex]i^{i}=e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}+2ki\pi} \ ,\ k\in\mathbb{Z}[/tex]

Daniel.
 
No, that's not what I wanted to write. I meant that i^i has an infinite number of real, distinct values as given by the general form. The form you wrote trivially gives only a single real value.

My first form was wrong because it generated values for (-i)^i as well. But this form is definitely right.

Complex exponentiation is multivalued, and yes, it can even give an infinite number of distinct real results.
 
Last edited:
Nope.Everything is in terms of real numbers.U use equality sign,and the reals have a funny way of behaving way when in the presence of the equality sign...

[tex]i^{i}=:a\in\mathbb{R}[/tex]

You're telling me that [tex]a=e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}=e^{-\frac{5\pi}{2}}=e^{-\frac{9\pi}{2}}=...[/tex]

and that's profoundly incorrect.

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
[tex]i^{i}=:a\in\mathbb{R}[/tex]

You're telling me that [tex]a=e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}=e^{-\frac{5\pi}{2}}=e^{-\frac{9\pi}{2}}=...[/tex]

and that's profoundly incorrect.

This isn't what he's saying. He's saying that you have many different choices for [tex]i^i:=e^{i\log{i}}[/tex]. log is a multivalued function, [tex]\log{i}=\pi i/2+2\pi i k[/tex] for any integer k. The choice of k chooses the branch of log you are working with. So [tex]i^i=e^{i(\pi i/2+2\pi i k)}=e^{-\pi /2-2\pi k}[/tex] and the different values of k give different values of i^i, depending on which branch of log you're using. [tex]e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}},e^{-\frac{5\pi}{2}},e^{-\frac{9\pi}{2}},\ldots[/tex] are all valid answers for i^i, just as [tex]\pi i/2,5\pi i/2,9\pi i/2,\ldots[/tex] are all valid answers for log(i).
 
shmoe said:
This isn't what he's saying. He's saying that you have many different choices for [tex]i^i:=e^{i\log{i}}[/tex]. log is a multivalued function, [tex]\log{i}=\pi i/2+2\pi i k[/tex] for any integer k. The choice of k chooses the branch of log you are working with. So [tex]i^i=e^{i(\pi i/2+2\pi i k)}=e^{-\pi /2-2\pi k}[/tex] and the different values of k give different values of i^i, depending on which branch of log you're using. [tex]e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}},e^{-\frac{5\pi}{2}},e^{-\frac{9\pi}{2}},\ldots[/tex] are all valid answers for i^i, just as [tex]\pi i/2,5\pi i/2,9\pi i/2,\ldots[/tex] are all valid answers for log(i).


^Exactly. :smile:
 
dextercioby said:
Alright.Point taken.:smile: I never thought of it this way before,so i have a reason to thank you.

Daniel.

Cool. :smile: Perhaps the orig. poster was not right when he said math is weird, but math certainly is beautiful and mysterious. ;)
 
Curious3141 said:
Cool. :smile: Perhaps the orig. poster was not right when he said math is weird, but math certainly is beautiful and mysterious. ;)
"The arcane pleasures of abstruse maths is only for the select few of lofty intellect and weird speech patterns"

Was that what you meant?..:wink:
 
arildno said:
"The arcane pleasures of abstruse maths is only for the select few of lofty intellect and weird speech patterns"

Was that what you meant?..:wink:

Oooh, I have goosebumps. LOL. :biggrin: