Why Is My Calculation of Force Along a Line Incorrect in Statics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the miscalculation of force components in a statics problem. The user initially calculated the force using Fcos(tan-1(3/4)), arriving at 320 N, but the correct answer is 420 N. The error stems from only calculating the x component of the force instead of both x and y components for forces AB and CD. To resolve such issues, one must set the sum of the x or y components equal to the corresponding components of the given force.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector components in physics
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their applications
  • Familiarity with static equilibrium conditions
  • Ability to analyze forces in two dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method for resolving forces into components in statics problems
  • Learn about static equilibrium and the conditions for equilibrium in two dimensions
  • Review trigonometric identities and their applications in physics
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple forces and their resultant vectors
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers, and anyone involved in statics and mechanics who need to accurately calculate force components in two-dimensional systems.

vineroon
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
2lscoxu.jpg


I have been having trouble with this seemingly easy problem. You would think that it is just as simple as finding Fcos(tan-1(3/4)), which yields the answer 320 N. However, as seen in the image, the actual answer is 420 N.

I would appreciate any help.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've calculated the x component of the given force. That's not what the problem is asking. You need to calculate the x and y components of the forces AB and CD, then set the sum of those x or y components equal to the x or y components, respectively, of the given force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K