1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why is my proof wrong? (analysis)

  1. Dec 5, 2012 #1
    I was trying to prove this, but something went wrong and I'm not sure what...

    We know that the greatest value of sin(1/x) can be 1 and the lowest value can be -1...

    We know that the upper darboux sum is...

    [tex]U(f,P) = sup(f[t_{k-1} , t_t]) (t_k - t_{k-1}) = (1) (1-(-1)) = 2[/tex]


    We also know that the lower darboux sum is...

    [tex]L(f,P) = inf(f[t_{k-1} , t_t]) (t_k - t_{k-1}) = (-1) (1-(-1)) = -12[/tex]

    So we know that...

    [tex]U(f,P) - L(f,P) = 2 - (-2) = 4 > \epsilon[/tex]

    Can anybody tell me where I went wrong?

    Thanks in advance
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 5, 2012 #2

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    What are you trying to prove in the first place??

    And don't there need to be summations in the [itex]U(f,P)[/itex] and [itex]L(f,P)[/itex]?? How did you choose P anyway?

    I also don't see where -12 comes from. Did you mean -2?

    What is [itex]\epsilon[/itex] supposed to be?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Why is my proof wrong? (analysis)
Loading...