Why is octanol prioritized for partition coefficients?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Octanol is the preferred solvent for partition coefficient studies in environmental chemistry due to its established efficacy in estimating toxicity and membrane crossing potential. While alternatives like hexadecane exist, octanol remains the standard primarily because it was the first solvent used in laboratory procedures. Recent discussions highlight that emerging pollutants, particularly perfluoro compounds, may not be accurately assessed using log Kow values derived from octanol-water partitioning, indicating a need for new methodologies. The historical context of octanol's use reveals its advantages in simulating lipid phases and facilitating interphase transport of solutes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partition coefficients, specifically n-octanol-water partition coefficients.
  • Familiarity with environmental chemistry and toxicity assessment methodologies.
  • Knowledge of molecular structure-property relationships in chemistry.
  • Awareness of chromatographic techniques and their applications in analyzing solute properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research alternative solvents for partition coefficient studies, focusing on hexadecane and other emerging options.
  • Explore the implications of using perfluoro compounds in toxicity assessments and their limitations with traditional methods.
  • Investigate the historical development of partition coefficient methodologies and their evolution in laboratory practices.
  • Learn about advanced chromatographic techniques for analyzing solute behavior in various phases.
USEFUL FOR

Environmental chemists, toxicologists, researchers in chemical ecology, and professionals involved in assessing the toxicity of emerging pollutants will benefit from this discussion.

SemM
Gold Member
Messages
194
Reaction score
13
Hi, it is well established that octanol is the preferred solvent for partition coefficient studies in environmental chemistry, however, some studies ui.e Noble A. Parition coefficients (n-octanol-water) for pesticides) J Chromat. 642 3-14, mention that estimating toxicity based on solubility in octanol and water is not optimal. Other alternatives are present, such as hexadecane, however, octanol is established as the main partition coefficient for toxicity studies. What are the reasons for this?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
SemM said:
What are the reasons for this?
"This" is a procedural prescription; there is no "why" beyond that "that" was the only solvent in the laboratory when the procedure was developed.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
Bystander said:
"This" is a procedural prescription; there is no "why" beyond that "that" was the only solvent in the laboratory when the procedure was developed.

I see. The reason for this question, is that several new emerging pollutants are actually discerned better for toxicity and membrane crossing potential using other solvents, and particularly some toxic compounds, such as the perfluoro compounds are to part not even calculable at all using log Kow empirically (see report on PFOS in the EU commission) and therefore can require other methods and perhaps a new standard.
 
The discussion is about models, laboratory and mental procedures. The more general is a model, the less precise is in fitting to a given new situation. For biochemical considerations, more than century ago, there was precedure of measuring oil/water partition coefficients. Applying various plant and animal-derived oils gave various results. Laboratories begun to use single triglycerides, which was highly expensive. For some solutes, there was ordering of oil phase with triglyceride condensation (sometimes even crystallization) in unexpected places of laboratory stills. Less than century ago it was realized that pure triglycerides have melting points above "room temperature", and its liquid existence is mainly a result of difficulties in crystallization. These are times of beginning of interpretation of compounds physical properties using molecular structures and a start to mental incompatibility between chemists and medicine/hygiene/biology/food/ecology/toxicology workers. The former try to understand structure-properties ralations, the later need inexpensive liquid simulating hydrophobic behaviour of matter. During single generation it was practicised that n-octanol is quite a good such liquid. Work started from n-octane and isooctane, but even their mixtures were inappropriate as a models for laboratory hydrophobic phases. During shaking with aqueous solutions dispersions were formed and phase separations demand centrifuging or even more sophisticated treatment. Also saturation of hydrocarbon phase with solute from aqueous one was sluggish, because of almost complete non-mixing. Minute amount if interphase mixing/solution was needed and n-octanol gives it. This of course gaves some errors, but biologist do not need absolute values. Quite satisfactionary were no- dimensional and no-name numbers easy to obtain is standarized laboratory conditions.
Today we understand that n-octanol is a good structural analog of lipid phase because of its short range ordering of dipoles. On the border with aqueous phase there even is short duration surface activity which speeds interphase transport of solutes.
Of course, these numbers are hopeless as single indicators of molecular properties and useless for quantifying membrane properties, but in combination wirth other data (mainly chromatographic retention factors or times) are useful in classification of properties of small groups of structurally related substances. To achieve undestanding of molecular analogies in cellular transport of species, one must use vast number of results of experiments in partition between stationary and mobile phases of various structures. Many-dimensional analysis can give properties of membrane and solute as arrays of numbers. Such a complex work do not guarantee obtaining simple answer to simple questions, so the problem waits for solution. For many practical purposes partition with n-octanol must be satisfactionary.

zbikraw
 
  • Like
Likes SemM
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K