Why is p=fv different than calculatingit manually

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jiggleswiggly
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of a sprinter's power output using two different methods: the formula for power as p = f*v and the average power calculation using distance and time. The correct force acting on the sprinter is determined to be 87.5N, leading to a power output of 224 joules when calculated using distance. However, the instantaneous power output is found to be double that value when applying the p = f*v formula, highlighting the distinction between average and instantaneous power calculations in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of force, power, and acceleration
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations, specifically d = 1/2*a*t^2
  • Basic grasp of instantaneous vs. average power calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between force and acceleration in Newton's laws
  • Learn about instantaneous power calculations in physics
  • Explore the implications of average vs. instantaneous values in motion
  • Investigate the application of kinematic equations in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, sports scientists, and anyone interested in biomechanics and the physics of motion will benefit from this discussion.

jiggleswiggly
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A 49.0 sprinter, starting from rest, runs 45.0in 7.10 at constant acceleration.
What is the magnitude of the horizontal force acting on the sprinter?


okay so I got 87.5N which is correct

Then it asks:
What is the sprinter's power output at 1.70 , 3.60 , and 5.50 ?


why is it when you use d=1/2*a*t^2
it is wrong

see:
(1/2)*(1.78)(1.7)^2 = 2.57 for distance

then 2.57*87.5= 224 joules

then for power it is 224/1.7 = 131

but the answer is exactly twice that

if you use p=f*v you get the correct answer straight away

shouldn't these be the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the power output isn't constant, and when you're calculating the power using the distance traveled and the time elapsed, you're finding the average power up to that point, not the instantaneous power.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K