Why is phi(n) always an even number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crypto_rsa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The totient function, denoted as phi(n), is always even for any integer n greater than 2. This conclusion is derived from the properties of the function, particularly its multiplicativity and the pairing of integers that are coprime to n. For a prime power n = p^k, phi(p^k) = p^k - 1(p - 1) confirms that phi(n) is even since (p - 1) is even. Additionally, the argument presented shows that for each integer m that is coprime to n, there exists a distinct integer n - m that is also coprime to n, leading to an even count of such integers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Euler's totient function phi(n)
  • Basic knowledge of prime numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of coprime integers
  • Knowledge of mathematical proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Euler's totient function in detail
  • Learn about the multiplicative nature of the totient function
  • Explore proof techniques in number theory, especially proof by contradiction
  • Investigate applications of the totient function in cryptography and modular arithmetic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone interested in the properties of the Euler's totient function.

crypto_rsa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I know it's a dumb question but I can't figure out why the totient of n is always even (I've read in a book that it "follows immediately from the definition of the totient function", so it should not require any theorem to prove). It is clear to me that it holds true for

n = pk, where p is a prime, because
phi(pk) = pk - 1(p - 1) and (p - 1) is even

But why is it true in the general case? I think I could use multiplicativity of phi() to prove it but I am confused by the "follows from definition" note.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see how it follows immediately from the definition, either. But it's clear from the formula for phi that phi(n) is even for any n > 2.
 
Perhaps the author had in mind the following argument:

Suppose that 1 \leq m < n and (m,n) = 1. Then it's easy to see that (n-m,n) = 1. Also, it can't be true that m = n-m because then 2m = n and so (n,m) > 1. Thus, for each such m we have another integer (n-m), distinct from m, that also satisfies 1 \leq n-m < n and (n-m,n) = 1. So, we have partitioned the integers from 1 to n-1 that are relatively prime to n into two sets of the same size. We conclude that the number of such integers, phi (n), is even.

Petek
 
There is a way how to prove it using just the definition:

If x is prime to n, then also n - x is prime to n (easily proven by contradiction). Except for the case when x = n/2, x and n - x are distinct. But when x = n/2, then n/x = 2 and x is not prime to n. So the numbers which are primes to n come always in pairs and thus their total number is even.

More information can be found at http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51541.html".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
893
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
976