Why is Planck time scaled by c^5?

apeiron
Gold Member
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
2
Just curious.

The Planck length is lpl = (hG/c3)1/2 = 10-33cm

And it seems intuitive that it's c cube because space has three dimensions for the action.

But the Planck time is tpl = (hG/c5)1/2 = 10-43s

So is there some obvious physical reason why c is to the power of five here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Planck time is just the Planck length divided by c. This adds two powers of c because they are inside the square root.
 
apeiron said:
Just curious.

The Planck length is lpl = (hG/c3)1/2 = 10-33cm

And it seems intuitive that it's c cube because space has three dimensions for the action.

But the Planck time is tpl = (hG/c5)1/2 = 10-43s

So is there some obvious physical reason why c is to the power of five here?

Yes, that's the only combination of physical constants that gives you a constant with time units
 
phyzguy said:
The Planck time is just the Planck length divided by c. This adds two powers of c because they are inside the square root.

Thanks. Beautifully simple.
 
apeiron said:
Just curious.

The Planck length is lpl = (hG/c3)1/2 = 10-33cm

And it seems intuitive that it's c cube because space has three dimensions for the action.
I don't see how a power of 3/2 looks natural.
The Planck volume has c9/2.

Those odd factors just show how "unnatural" the SI-units (where c, h, G, k are not nice numbers) are in terms of fundamental physics.
 
Newton said Gmm'/r=energy. In natural units, that means G is a (length)^2.
The hbar and c are just put into get G in cm^2. This is always unique.
 
what does "space has 3 dimensions for the action"? I mean that it's kind of weird, we don't know whether at Planck scale you need more than 3 spatial dimensions, so it's not so intuitive...
On the other hand, everything seems normal under what is called dimensional analysis... So you have some constants ([itex]G, c, \hbar[/itex]) and you want to build characteristic quantities out of them ... So for everything, you just write:
[itex][X]= [c]^{a} [\hbar]^{b} [G]^{d}[/itex]
and you solve for [itex]a,b,d[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K