harrylentil
- 33
- 5
Even with the charge screening effect it is exact. Is there an explanation in the standard model? Can the fact there are 3 families of particles be involved?
The discussion centers on the precise charge assignments of quarks in the Standard Model, specifically why quark charges are exactly 1/3 or 2/3 of the lepton charge. It is established that the hypercharge assignments within the SU(2) and SU(3) groups lead to these fractional charges while maintaining anomaly cancellation across generations. The conversation also explores hypothetical scenarios where different families of particles possess varying unit charges, emphasizing that while such theories can be internally consistent, they do not align with our observable universe. The implications of these charge assignments on particle interactions, particularly in relation to weak isospin and hypercharge, are also examined.
PREREQUISITESParticle physicists, theoretical physicists, and students studying the Standard Model and its implications on particle interactions and charge assignments.
Orodruin said:The anomaly cancelation occurs generation by generation
Vanadium 50 said:One implication of this is that a world where each family had a different unit charge - say 1.0e, 1.1e and 1.2e, would be completely internally consistent.
nikkkom said:How would muon decay look in such a world?
Wouldn't it? I have not thought much about it until you raised the issue here, but at face value it would seem to me that the muon would have a charge of 1.1e and the muon neutrino a charge of 0.1e. The decay ##\mu \to e + \nu_\mu + \bar \nu_e## would then still be possible. The different quantum numbers of the families would of course prevent any kind of mixing by forbidding Yukawa couplings between families.Vanadium 50 said:It wouldn't. I said it would be internally consistent, not that it would match our world.
Can you do that for electric charge? What you can play with should be the hypercharge. For example, the left-handed leptons forming ##SU(2)_L## doublets invariably requires a charged lepton-neutrino-W-coupling. If the neutrino was electrically neutral and the charged lepton had a different charge from the W, this would not happen.Vanadium 50 said:I was thinking in terms of a scale.
Orodruin said:Can you do that for electric charge?
While true for one generation, I do not see how you can give different generations different charges while keeping neutrinos neutral as they have to couple to the Ws and the Ws will have a fixed electric charge. Based on the Gell-Mann-Nishijima formula (which essentially just depends on how you break electroweak symmetry with the Higgs), the electric charge difference between the charged lepton and the neutrino should be the same in all generations (one if you normalise to the charge difference between the upper and lower part of the ##SU(2)## doublets - this should also set the normalisation of hypercharge). The electromagnetic current should be of the formVanadium 50 said:Sure. There is nothing in the SM that sets what the electron's elementary charge is.
But unlike hypercharge you cannot scale the SU(2) coupling constant arbitrarily between generations. It has to be the same coupling constant that appears in the non-linear kinetic gauge term or you break gauge invariance. Of course it does not have to match reality, but I am assuming that the theory is internally consistent and, that SU(2) is broken by a single Higgs so that we can still talk about electric charge. Since the EM U(1) remains unbroken, electric charge must be conserved.Vanadium 50 said:The reason this works for electric charges is because I can simultaneously scale the strength of weak isospin and weak hypercharge to make it so.