Why Is the Calculated Charge Enclosed Within the Cube Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vrinda mukund
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the calculation of the electric displacement vector D within a cube, defined as D =(4x²y + z)i + (4xy)j - zk (c/m²). The user initially calculated the divergence of D, ∇ . D, and integrated it over a unit cube, obtaining a charge of 3 coulombs, while the correct value is 4 coulombs. The divergence was recalculated as ∇ . D = 8xy + 4x - 1, indicating a misunderstanding in the initial computation. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately defining the components of D and the cube's location for correct charge calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric displacement vectors and their components
  • Familiarity with divergence operations in vector calculus
  • Knowledge of volume integrals in three-dimensional space
  • Experience with Mathematica for computational verification
NEXT STEPS
  • Review vector calculus, focusing on divergence and its physical significance
  • Learn to perform volume integrals over defined geometric shapes
  • Explore the use of Mathematica for solving vector field problems
  • Study the implications of charge density variations in electric fields
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in electromagnetism and vector calculus, particularly those working with electric displacement and charge calculations.

vrinda mukund
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
The displacement vector in a cube is defined by the relation D =(4x*xy + z)i+(4xy)j-(z)k c/m2 . Then charge enclosed within the cube of side 1m is …………..
I know that the displacement vector holds the relation
∇ . D = ρ
Where ρ is the charge density. I found ∇ . D and calculated its volume integral with x,y and z varying between 0 and 1. What I got was 3 coloumb but the correct answer is 4 colomb. Can someone help me with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not exactly clear to me, how your [itex]\vec{D}[/itex] reads. Please use the LaTeX formulas. I read it as follows

[tex]\vec{D}=\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 4 x^2 y +z\\<br /> 4 x y \\<br /> z<br /> \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Then

[tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{D}=4xy+4x+1.[/tex]

The next question is, where your cube is located. I used Mathematica to calculate for your cube, which you give as [itex][0,1] \times [0,1] \times [0,1][/itex]. Then I get 5 (whatever units you use, since these are also inconsistent).
 
sir, actually D is having -z as k component. ∇ . D = 8xy + 4x -1 then.(u have written it as 4xy+4x+1). nothing is mentioned in the question about the location of the cube. i didn't understand your [0 X 1] technique sir. can you please explain?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K