Why Is My Calculation of Electrostatic Equilibrium Incorrect?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
cs44167
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A charge of 2.0 microcoulombs is positioned at (0,0) and a charge of -6.0 microcoulombs is positioned at (3,0). Where must a third charge be placed in order to be in electrostatic equilibrium?
Relevant Equations
Electrostatic Force = kq1q2/d^2
I set the electrostatic force exerted by the object at (0,0) and (3,0) equal to each other, dividing out k and q2. I was left with q1/d^2 for both terms and substituted in the given charges for each object. I then replaced d^2 for the object at (0,0) with “x^2” and d^2 for the object at (3,0) with “(3-x)^2”. I got an answer of (1.098, 0) which made sense that it would be somewhere left of 1.50, but was incorrect.

Any helpers in where I went wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Orodruin said:
In which directions do the forces go?
So the third charge would have to be to the left of the origin, correct?

Then you would have negative-positive-negative.

From there I’m struggling with Coulomb’s Law because we don’t know the magnitude of the charge on the third object. I have q3q1/x^2 =q1q2/3^2 but we don’t know x or q3.
 
cs44167 said:
So the third charge would have to be to the left of the origin, correct?

Then you would have negative-positive-negative.

From there I’m struggling with Coulomb’s Law because we don’t know the magnitude of the charge on the third object. I have q3q1/x^2 =q1q2/3^2 but we don’t know x or q3.

Make sure to draw a diagram. Try positioning this third charge at a distance ##d## to the left of the origin, and then draw on the forces. I don't believe you need to know ##q_{3}##.
 
cs44167 said:
So the third charge would have to be to the left of the origin, correct?

Then you would have negative-positive-negative.

From there I’m struggling with Coulomb’s Law because we don’t know the magnitude of the charge on the third object. I have q3q1/x^2 =q1q2/3^2 but we don’t know x or q3.

You can look at this two ways. You can take any charge ##q_3## and try to make the total force on ##q_3## due to ##q_1## and ##q_2## equal to zero. If ##q_3## doesn't cancel out, then you have a serious conceptual or mathematical problem!

Or, you can look for a position where the electric field due to ##q_1## and ##q_2## is zero. Then, clearly, the value of ##q_3## is irrelevant.
 
cs44167 said:
I have q3q1/x^2 =q1q2/3^2 but we don’t know x or q3.
Can you write down in words what ##\frac{q_3q_1}{x^2}## is supposed to be? It is the force of object [which] on object [which other]?

Can you write down in words what ##\frac{q_3q_2}{3^2}## is supposed to be? It is the force of object [which] on object [which other]?

Which object are you trying to find the force on?