Why is the Cartesian Product S×T Empty When T is Empty?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rmiller70015
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Theoretical
Click For Summary
When set T is empty, the Cartesian product S×T is also empty. This is because the definition of the Cartesian product involves creating ordered pairs (s, t) where s is from set S and t is from set T. Since there are no elements in T, there are no possible pairs to form, resulting in S×T being empty. The discussion emphasizes that without elements in T, the product cannot yield any results. Therefore, S×T equals the empty set.
rmiller70015
Messages
110
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let S be any set and T = ∅. What can you say about the set S×T?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is that S×T=∅. I'm not quite sure why this is though. Is it because there isn't anything in T to give an ordered pair so S×T is empty?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you find anything in ##S \times T##?
 
rmiller70015 said:

Homework Statement


Let S be any set and T = ∅. What can you say about the set S×T?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is that S×T=∅. I'm not quite sure why this is though. Is it because there isn't anything in T to give an ordered pair so S×T is empty?

Well, when we write out the definition of AxB, we have:

AxB = {(a,b) | a ∈ A and b ∈ B}

Now, apply this to your set, what do you notice?
 
Math_QED said:
Well, when we write out the definition of AxB, we have:

AxB = {(a,b) | a ∈ A and b ∈ B}

Now, apply this to your set, what do you notice?
There is no element t for the set T. And the set theoretical product does not make sense. Except for (∅,∅).
 
rmiller70015 said:
There is no element t for the set T. And the set theoretical product does not make sense. Except for (∅,∅).

##\emptyset \notin \emptyset##
 
rmiller70015 said:
There is no element t for the set T. And the set theoretical product does not make sense. Except for (∅,∅).

Let SxT = {(s,t)|s ∈ S and t ∈ T}
Suppose that SxT ≠ ∅...

Try to find a contradiction, then follows that S x T = ∅
 
Math_QED said:
Let SxT = {(s,t)|s ∈ S and t ∈ T}
Suppose that SxT ≠ ∅...

Try to find a contradiction, then follows that S x T = ∅
Ok thank you, that makes sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K