Proving S is a Subset of T in R³

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set S = {(1, 2, 1), (1, 1, 2)} is a subset of T, where T is defined as T = {(x, y, 3x - y): x, y ∈ R}. The key conclusion is that to demonstrate S ⊆ T, it is sufficient to verify that each element of S can be expressed in the form defined by T. The participants agree that finding a linear combination of the elements of S is not necessary for this proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and subset definitions
  • Familiarity with vector representation in R³
  • Knowledge of linear combinations and their implications
  • Basic grasp of parametric equations in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to express points in R³ using parametric equations
  • Study the concept of spanning sets and their relevance in vector spaces
  • Learn about subset proofs in set theory
  • Explore the implications of linear combinations in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, mathematicians interested in set theory, and educators teaching vector spaces and subset relationships.

umzung
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that S ⊆ T, where S and T are both subsets of R^3.

Homework Equations


S = {(1, 2, 1), (1, 1, 2)},
T ={(x,y,3x−y): x,y∈R}

The Attempt at a Solution


I considered finding if S is a spanning set for T but I'm aware that this is perhaps not relevant. If I find {α(1, 2, 1) + β(1, 1, 2): α, β ∈ R}, would this show S to be a subset of T?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Unzung, :welcome:

umzung said:
I'm aware that this is perhaps not relevant
You are right there !

You are done once you have shown that each element of S is also a member of T.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K