Why is the Displacement Formula ½at2?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formula for displacement in physics, specifically why the equation for distance is expressed as x = ½at² when derived from the relationships involving velocity and acceleration. The scope includes conceptual clarification and mathematical reasoning related to kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the origin of the ½ in the displacement formula x = ½at², suggesting a connection to the equations x = vt and v = at.
  • Another participant introduces the concepts of integration and differentiation in calculus as a potential explanation for the formula.
  • A third participant clarifies that the equation x = vt applies only when acceleration a = 0, emphasizing the need to consider the entire formula rather than parts of it.
  • This participant presents the equations for motion with and without acceleration, detailing how to derive the displacement formula from average velocity.
  • The final equation presented relates the squares of velocities and displacement under constant acceleration, indicating a broader context for the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of understanding regarding the derivation of the displacement formula, with some proposing calculus as a solution while others focus on the implications of constant acceleration. No consensus is reached on a singular explanation.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the conditions of motion (e.g., constant acceleration versus no acceleration) are not fully explored, and the discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps involved in deriving the displacement formula.

Voltz
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hey, first post (:
Was just wondering why the formula for distance is

x = ½ at2

if v = at

and x = vt
then why is it ½ when you substitute in a?

x = distance
v = velocity
t = time
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Voltz said:
Hey, first post (:
Was just wondering why the formula for distance is

x = ½ at2

if v = at

and x = vt
then why is it ½ when you substitute in a?

x = distance
v = velocity
t = time

Are you familiar with integration and differentiation in calculus? That's the easist way to explain it.
 
Nice post. Very good how you defined the variables

x = vt
means that there is no acceleration so a = 0, and you have to plug into the whole formula and not just part of it.
( ie with a=0 and using only half an equation, x = (1/2) at^2 becomes x = 0 )


The actual forms of the equation are:
x1-x0 = v0 x t with no acceleration ie a=0 Eq 0

With constant acceleration
x1-x0 = ( v0 + v1)/2 x t Eq 1
where ( v0 + v1)/2 is the average velocity

Also v1 = at + v0 Eq 2

sustitute equation 1 into 2
x1 - x0 = ( v0 + at + v0 )/2 x t
or x1 - x0 = v0 t + (1/2) a t^2 Eq 3

the final equation of for rectinear motion with constant acceleration is
(v1)^2 - (v0)^2 = 2a(x1-x0) Eq 4

Hope that helps.
you have to plug into the whole formula - not just part of it.
 
Thanks good sirs
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
939
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
940
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K