Why Is the Electric Field Stronger at Sharp Edges on Conductors?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kended
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E-field Sharp
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of electric fields at conductors, specifically why the electric field is stronger at sharp edges compared to flatter regions. Participants explore concepts related to charge density, surface curvature, and the implications of these factors on electric field strength.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the relationship between sharp edges and electric field strength, suggesting that higher charge density at sharp points may contribute to this phenomenon.
  • Another participant asserts that charge density is indeed higher at sharper regions and references an external source for further explanation.
  • A different viewpoint explains that flat surfaces maintain an even charge distribution due to constant exposed surface area, while sharp edges have more surface area exposed per unit volume, leading to higher charge density.
  • A hypothetical scenario is presented involving two metal balls of different sizes, prompting a question about the electric field strength near their surfaces, suggesting a relationship between size, capacitance, and electric field intensity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that charge density is higher at sharper regions, but the discussion includes varying explanations and hypotheses regarding the underlying mechanisms and implications, indicating that multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the specific mechanisms by which sharp edges affect local charge distribution at an atomic level, nor does it clarify the relationship between charge density and electric field strength in all contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying electrostatics, electrical engineering, or anyone curious about the behavior of electric fields in relation to conductor geometry.

kended
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

Could someone explain or direct me to some detailed explanations as to why is the electric field at a conductor greatest where the curvature is sharpest?

I just can't seem to grasp this concept. I understand sharp edges do have this property so is this that there is more charge density at those points? And if so, what would prevent another point close by (on a rounded surface) to have the same charge density given that both points are at the same KV potential?

In another words, how is a sharp edge (high curvature) affecting the local charge distribution at an atomic level?

Thanks for enlightening me :)

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge density is indeed higher at sharper regions.

I think this site is quite good at explaining why.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/u8l4d.cfm

Just scroll down to the "Electric Fields and Surface Curvature" section and it'll explain how the sharper regions results in a smaller component of the electron-electron electrostatic repulsive force being directed parallel to the conductor surface.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 2 people
Where there is a flat surface, the charge distribution is even because the exposed surface area of the object per unit volume of space surrounding it is constant. Where you have a sharp edge, or a pointed protrusion on an object, there is more surface area exposed per unit volume of space immediately surrounding it - and so a higher charge density in that region of 3D space.

The link posted by the other poster is very good, and should explain the rest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Let's consider this charged object:

O-------o

Two metal balls and a thin metal rod between them.

Let's say the small ball has a radius that is half of the big one's radius. So its capacitance is half of the other one's capacitance. So its charge is half of the big ball's charge.I'm lazy, so I leave this question as an exersice for the reader:
Why is the electric field near the small ball's surface twice as large as the electric field near the large ball's surface?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K