Why is the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## so divisive?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of the function ##\arcsin(\sin(x))##, specifically the challenges in finding its antiderivative and evaluating the definite integral ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt##. Participants explore the behavior of the function across different intervals and the discrepancies in results provided by computational tools.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the difficulty in finding a general antiderivative for ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## and highlights inconsistencies in results from WolframAlpha and Symbolab.
  • Another participant suggests that ##\arcsin(\sin(t))## can be expressed as ##t + 2n\pi## for integer values of ##n##, proposing that the integral simplifies to ##\frac{1}{2}x^{2} + 2n\pi x##.
  • A different participant clarifies that the ##\arcsin## function has a limited range, leading to different expressions for ##\arcsin(\sin(t))## in various intervals, indicating a sawtooth pattern.
  • Another response proposes a piecewise definition for the integral over specific intervals, suggesting that the integral can be expressed differently depending on the value of ##x##.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the evaluation of the integral, with some asserting a straightforward expression while others emphasize the complexity and piecewise nature of the function. There is no consensus on a single correct approach to the integral.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of using computational tools for integrals involving piecewise functions and the need for careful consideration of the function's behavior across different domains.

Saracen Rue
Messages
150
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
Various sources give different answers to ##\arcsin(\sin(x))##, and none of them seem to actually be fully correct. Why is this the case, and is there an actual answer?
Initially, I was attempting to find the function which expresses the area under enclosed between the function ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## and the ##x##-axis (so technically I am looking for ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## specifically, but got caught up on finding the general antiderivative).

This lead me to attempting to integrate ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## using WolframAlpha, which gave me ##x\arcsin\left(\sin\left(x\right)\right)-\frac{x^{2}}{2}\sec\left(x\right)\sqrt{\cos^{2}\left(x\right)}##. After a quick inspection of the function, it became clear that something just wasn't quite right. So, I graphed it against ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## and quickly saw that, which being accurate for the domain ##(-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2})##, it wasn't at all accurate outside of that domain. I next used Symbolab to attempt to evaluate ##\int \arcsin(\sin(x)) dx## and it gave me the result ##\frac{\arcsin\left(\sin\left(x\right)\right)^{2}}{2}##. Again, this seems to be correct for the domain ##(-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2})##, but not for ##(\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{3\pi}{2})##... but then it is correct for ##(\frac{3\pi}{2}, \frac{5\pi}{2})## but not for ##(\frac{5\pi}{2}, \frac{7\pi}{2})## and so on.

Honestly, this has kind of left me stumped. I tried watching several Youtube videos but they all either have one of the answers above or are just completely wrong in their entirety. Why is it that no one can seem to agree on what this indefinite integral should be? I can understand if there's no way to fully express it in terms of elementary functions, but why not say that? WolframAlpha and Symbolab will both say there's no standard solution for integrating something like ##x^x##, so why do they both confidently give incorrect or at very least only partially correct answers to this integral? At the very least they should tell you that the antiderivative is only valid over a certain domain.

Finally, if anyone can find a way to evaluate ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Saracen Rue said:
Finally, if anyone can find a way to evaluate ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time.
I don't understand your issue. Isn't ##\arcsin\left(\sin\left(t\right)\right)\equiv\sin^{-1}\left(\sin(t)\right)=t+2n\pi## (where ##n=0,\pm1,\pm2,\ldots##)? So doesn't your integral simply evaluate to ##\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+2n\pi x##? (Note that for ##n=0##, that's precisely the answer returned by both Wolfram Alpha and Symbolab.)
 
renormalize said:
I don't understand your issue. Isn't ##\arcsin\left(\sin\left(t\right)\right)\equiv\sin^{-1}\left(\sin(t)\right)=t+2n\pi## (where ##n=0,\pm1,\pm2,\ldots##)? So doesn't your integral simply evaluate to ##\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+2n\pi x##? (Note that for ##n=0##, that's precisely the answer returned by both Wolfram Alpha and Symbolab.)
The ##\arcsin## function gives a value in the range ##[-\frac \pi 2, \frac \pi 2]##. So:

For ##0 \le t \le \frac \pi 2##, we have ##\arcsin(\sin t) = t##

For ##\frac \pi 2 \le t \le \frac {3\pi} 2##, we have ##\arcsin(\sin t) = \pi - t##

For ##\frac {3\pi} 2 \le t \le \frac {5\pi} 2##, we have ##\arcsin(\sin t) = t - 2\pi##

This is a sawtooth function, with period ##2\pi##.

It's not clear how you would describe the integral in terms of a single expression. The Wolfram answer works in each separate interval, but it's not going to work over the whole domain.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Saracen Rue and Ibix
Saracen Rue said:
Finally, if anyone can find a way to evaluate ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time.
The simplest approach is to reduce ##x## to the interval ##[0, 2\pi]##. The integral is the same for any ##x + 2n\pi##. Then $$\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt = $$$$\frac{x^2}{2} \ (0 \le x \le \frac \pi 2)$$$$\pi x - \frac{x^2}{2} - \frac{\pi^2}{4} \ (\frac \pi 2 \le x \le \frac {3\pi} 2)$$$$\frac{x^2}{2} - 2\pi x +2\pi^2 \ (\frac {3\pi} 2 \le x \le 2\pi)$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K