Why Is the Lag Time 60 Degrees Instead of 72 Degrees in Wave Phase Calculations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of phase difference and lag time in wave phase calculations, specifically questioning why the lag time is stated as 60 degrees instead of 72 degrees. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the relationship between the signals and the mathematical reasoning behind the phase difference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the phase relationship between two signals and questions the calculation of lag time as 60 degrees, expressing uncertainty about the division of cycles. Other participants question the accuracy of the original poster's interpretation and suggest that there may be a small math error involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the original poster's reasoning and questioning the assumptions made in the calculations. Some guidance is offered regarding the potential for small errors, but no consensus has been reached regarding the correct interpretation of the phase difference.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions an impending exam, indicating a time constraint and a need for clarity on the topic. There is also a reference to unsuccessful attempts to provide a diagram, which may limit the depth of the discussion.

ishterz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I came across this question on waves which tells you how to calculate the phase difference and the lag time but I don' uderstand why it is 60 degrees.Although I'm notable to draw th diagram,I will write down the explanation

What is the phase relationship b/w the two signals?(y1 and y2)

The difference between the squares of the signals on the graphs is 4 and one wavelength of y2 is 20 squares.
So it says that the lag is 1/5 of a cycle of 360 degrees which is 60 degrees.

I understand where the 1/5th came from but how is it 60 and not 72 which is what you get after you divide 5 by 360? I thought the answer was wrong but similar questions have answers mismatched with mine as well.

So please help! I've got my exam tomorrow!

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
According to your description, I can't find any flaws in your solution. Especially if it says "the lag is 1/5 of a cycle of 360 degrees which is 60 degrees", there is probably a small math error. I can't be sure without the diagram though.

Can you try to post a picture?
 
I tried posting the picture up but it was unsuccessful. I've pretty much described it in the question though.
I don't understand,how is 60 1/5 of 360? isn't it 1/6th ? Why is it saying 1/5th ? =S
 
They probably just made a small mistake. Try some other examples and the concepts will become clearer. Don't get hung up on the same problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K