Why is the standard form of a linear equation significant in graphing?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of the standard form of a linear equation, represented as ax + by = c, particularly in the context of graphing. Participants explore the reasons for using this form compared to other representations like point-slope or slope-intercept forms.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the purpose of the standard form and its significance in graphing, with some suggesting it may be for presentation purposes. Others consider its utility in identifying characteristics of equations, especially as polynomial degrees increase.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring various interpretations of the standard form's significance. Some participants have offered insights into its advantages, such as accommodating vertical lines, while others are questioning the necessity of transforming the equation for graphing purposes.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential constraints related to the forms of equations and their applicability, particularly regarding vertical lines and the implications of dividing by zero in certain transformations.

DecayProduct
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Why is the standard form of a linear equation ax + by = c? What is the significance of this particular way of writing the equation that makes it "standard"? When we graph a line, we always transform the equation into something else, such as the point-slope form, y = mx + b.

In other words, what is the equation, without transformation, used for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I've always been told that it's for presentation purposes. But then again I view that equation as more of a diophantine equation anyways.
 
I'm guessing a sorted polynomial form makes it easier to read and factor the thing? It doesn't really matter for a linear equation, but once you get higher degrees it does make a difference.

A quick glance at the first factor tells you the degree, you can easily locate the constant, you can quickly see if it is a complete square. If it was written as a slope, some of those would take longer.

k
 
One advantage of that form is that every line can be written in that form. A vertical line, say one in which x is always 3, has the form x= 3, of course, which is ax+ by= c with a= 1, b=0, c= 3. It cannot be written in the form y= mx+ b because solving ax+ by= c for y involves dividing by b which, here, is 0. Additionally, in y= mx+ b y is necessairily a function of x. If x= 3, that is not true.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K