Why is the Stream Function Psi Limited to 2-D Incompressible Flows?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The stream function psi is limited to two-dimensional incompressible flows due to the inherent characteristics of such flows, where the second streamfunction represents vertical planes without out-of-plane velocity. In three-dimensional flows, while it is mathematically feasible to use two streamfunctions, this approach is rarely employed due to its complexity compared to other methods. The discussion emphasizes that the simplicity of the two-dimensional case is what makes psi a practical tool in fluid mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of stream functions
  • Knowledge of two-dimensional and three-dimensional flow characteristics
  • Basic mathematical skills for fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of stream functions in fluid mechanics
  • Explore the application of stream functions in two-dimensional incompressible flow analysis
  • Investigate the complexities of representing three-dimensional flowfields using multiple streamfunctions
  • Learn about alternative methods for analyzing three-dimensional flows in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Fluid mechanics students, engineers specializing in fluid dynamics, and researchers interested in flow analysis and stream function applications.

haisol
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
As we learned in fluid mechanics, we can devise stream function psi

when the flow is 2-D, incompressible.

However, I cannot clearly explain why psi can be defined only for 2-D, mathematically or logically.

Is there any way to explain this, more than just say that 'just as it is'?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
thank you for your kind answer! It really helps me understanding!
 
Technically speaking, all flows are represented by a combination of two streamfunctions, even two-dimensional flows. In a typical two-dimensional flow, the second streamfunction is just a series of vertical planes (or planes rotated around the axis of symmetry for axisymmetric flow) since there is no out of plane velocity. This goes for any two-dimensional flow.

For a three-dimensional flow, both streamfunctions can be used to represent the flowfield, but you have to use both. Representing flowfields this way is not only uncommon, but pretty much unheard of due to the complexity of doing so and the relative ease of other methods. It is, however, mathematically possible to do.
 
I have encountered a vertically oriented hydraulic cylinder that is designed to actuate and slice heavy cabling into sections with a blade. The cylinder is quite small (around 1.5 inches in diameter) and has an equally small stroke. The cylinder is single acting (i.e. it is pressurized from the bottom, and vented to atmosphere with a spring return, roughly 200lbs of force on the spring). The system operates at roughly 2500 psi. Interestingly, the cylinder has a pin that passes through its...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K