News Why is the US ignoring the violence in Syria while intervening in Libya?

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the contrasting U.S. responses to violence in Syria and Libya, questioning why military intervention occurred in Libya but not Syria despite both experiencing severe government violence against civilians. Key points include the lack of oil resources in Syria, the absence of a unified opposition to support militarily, and Syria's significant regional influence and military capability, which complicates potential intervention. The United Nations has remained largely silent on Syria, leading to frustration over the perceived double standards in international responses. Participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of U.S. intervention, arguing that it could exacerbate regional tensions and that internal matters should be resolved without external interference. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of international politics and the challenges of humanitarian intervention.
  • #61
I am syrian and had to make acount to share what majority of syrian people think.

We don't want any forein intervention. We don't exactly have America/France/Britain in our harts and consider them as bad, if not worse, than our tyrant.

We consider America to be the number one terrorist state. How do you call killing hundred of thousands of innocent iraqis in a war based on lies, only to control region and oil? We call this terrorism.

Syrian people are well educated about western world imperialism. Please america, for once, mind your own business.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
damascus said:
I am syrian and had to make acount to share what majority of syrian people think.

We don't want any forein intervention. We don't exactly have America/France/Britain in our harts and consider them as bad, if not worse, than our tyrant.

We consider America to be the number one terrorist state. How do you call killing hundred of thousands of innocent iraqis in a war based on lies, only to control region and oil? We call this terrorism.

Syrian people are well educated about western world imperialism. Please america, for once, mind your own business.
I've spoken to a few Iraqi's who've been disposessed, displaced since 2003. They didn't like Sadaam, they didn't like the political situation, but, as they say it, at least they had a life. So, being an American, living in the US for my entire life, I can empathize with this. I certainly wouldn't want a foreign power to invade and occupy my land.

Unfortunately, the reality is that the world at large is not a just or fair place. Whether because of US past deeds or not, the ME is, generally, a hotbed of anti-US antagonism. That's a current fact that the US can't ignore. Plus, there's those vast oil reserves. The US is never, ever, going to just mind its own business.

It's a sort of war on many fronts. And propagandists on both sides will try to spin it in their favor. But, as I see it, it's a confrontation between two quite different ways of life. And while I can empathize with the anger of Arabs and Muslims, I still don't want them to win.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 298 ·
10
Replies
298
Views
73K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K