Why is there no acceleration in the southern/y direction?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 2K views
yashboi123
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A river flows due south with a speed of 2.5 m/s. You steer a motorboat across the river; your velocity relative to the water is 5.2 m/s due east. The river is 650 m wide.

How far south of your starting point will you reach the opposite bank?
Relevant Equations
Δ x = v 0 t + 1 2 a t 2
v = v 0 + a t
Δ x/ Δt = v
The correct answer is obtained by rearranging Δ x/ Δt = v. However, I assumed there would be some acceleration in the y direction so I tried to use the kinematic equations. To find the time I simply rearranged Δ x/ Δt = v, assigning v=5.2 m/s and Δ x = 650. I assumed there is no acceleration in the x/east direction, but why is there no acceleration in the y/southern direction?
 
on Phys.org
Think about what “velocity relative to the water” means.
 
so essentially relative to water means that speed is constant, in turn causing there to be no acceleration for the east direction. But why can we just assume the river has no acceleration?
 
yashboi123 said:
But why can we just assume the river has no acceleration?
Because the problem statement says that the river flows at a speed of 2.5m/s.
That implies an acceleration of 0.

Also, you're not given a value for acceleration, so if you aren't going to assume zero, what value would you assume?
 
DaveC426913 said:
Because the problem statement says that the river flows at a speed of 2.5m/s.
That implies an acceleration of 0.

Also, you're not given a value for acceleration, so if you aren't going to assume zero, what value would you assume?
Haha I thought we would have to find the acceleration ourselves then solve
 
Why do you keep saying "acceleration" ?
 
hmmm27 said:
Why do you keep saying "acceleration" ?
What else should I say.
 
yashboi123 said:
What else should I say.
Something relevant to the question, which has nothing that implies an acceleration.
 
So, what do you see as implying the need for an "acceleration" ?