Why is this a type II double integral?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of a double integral as type II, specifically examining the integral ∫∫_{A}xy^{2}dxdy over the area defined by the curves y = x^2, y = 2-x, and x ≥ 0. Participants explore the implications of this classification and the appropriate limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the integral is correctly classified as type II and provide limits of integration as ∫^{1}_{0}∫^{2-y}_{√y}xy^{2}dxdy.
  • Others question the validity of this classification and suggest an alternative approach using the order of integration as ∫^{2}_{0}∫^{2-x}_{x^2}xy^{2}dydx, arguing that the limits for x should be (0,1) based on the intersection of the curves.
  • A participant claims that the solution derived from the proposed integral is incorrect, stating that the correct solution is 17/120.
  • Another participant challenges the limits provided by others, suggesting that the integral should be split into two separate integrals based on the ranges of y and x, indicating a more complex integration process.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for errors in determining the bounded regions created by the curves, emphasizing the need for careful analysis of the integration limits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correct limits of integration and the classification of the integral. Multiple competing views remain on how to approach the problem and the validity of the proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made about the bounded regions and the limits of integration, as well as the potential for errors in the integration process due to the complexity of the area defined by the curves.

Avatrin
Messages
242
Reaction score
6
∫∫_{A}xy^{2}dxdy

A is the area between y = x^2, y = 2-x and x\geq0.

I am told that this is a type II double integral and I thus have to:

∫^{1}_{0}∫^{2-y}_{√y}xy^{2}dxdy

But, why can't I do this?

∫^{2}_{0}∫^{2-x}_{x^2}xy^{2}dydx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you hear of switching the order of integration?
 
Avatrin said:
∫∫_{A}xy^{2}dxdy

A is the area between y = x^2, y = 2-x and x\geq0.

I am told that this is a type II double integral and I thus have to:

∫^{1}_{0}∫^{2-y}_{√y}xy^{2}dxdy

But, why can't I do this?

∫^{2}_{0}∫^{2-x}_{x^2}xy^{2}dydx


The second integral should have (0,1) as the range for x, since the curves cross at x = 1.
 
It still is not the right answer. The solution to the equation you suggest is 47/120. The correct solution is 17/120 (i.e. the solution to the type II double integral)
 
Avatrin said:
∫∫_{A}xy^{2}dxdy

A is the area between y = x^2, y = 2-x and x\geq0.

I am told that this is a type II double integral and I thus have to:

∫^{1}_{0}∫^{2-y}_{√y}xy^{2}dxdy

Who told you this? That is clearly incorrect. For y between 0 and 1, x ranges between 0 and \sqrt{y}. For y between 1 and 2, x ranges between 0 and 2- y. Integrating in that order, the area has to be done as two separate integrals:
\int_{y=0}^1\int_{x= 0}^{\sqrt{y}} xy^2dxdy+ \int_{y=1}^2\int_{x= 0}^{2-y} xy^2 dxdy

Why can't I do this?

∫^{2}_{0}∫^{2-x}_{x^2}xy^{2}dydx

You can. It is the first integral that is incorrect.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Who told you this? That is clearly incorrect.

Well, it is an example in my book. The text is in Norwegian, but you will get the math:
http://img805.imageshack.us/img805/8316/eksempel2kap6.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Avatrin said:
∫∫_{A}xy^{2}dxdy

A is the area between y = x^2, y = 2-x and x\geq0.

I am told that this is a type II double integral and I thus have to:

∫^{1}_{0}∫^{2-y}_{√y}xy^{2}dxdy

But, why can't I do this?

∫^{2}_{0}∫^{2-x}_{x^2}xy^{2}dydx


Mathman and Halls of Ivy are both wrong.

Here's how your second integral needs to be corrected:

\int_{x=0}^1\int_{y=0}^{x^2}xy^2\ dydx+\int_{x=0}^1\int_{y=0}^{2-x}xy^2\ dydx

Of course that is easier to see with that picture above, but it goes to show you, even experts can make mistake with limits of integration for multidimensional regions. I've seen some that get really tricky in 3 dimensional regions. For instance, after you have the three constraints y=2-x, y=x^2 and x=0, you have to be careful that you pick the region in the plane that is "bounded" by these. What I mean is, there are actually 8 regions, created by the 3 lines (find them). Two of them are "bounded", by that I mean, we can't head infinitely far away. Can you find the two bounded regions (out of the eight total). But only one of them has a side or face of x=0.

My guess, Mathman jumped to the conclusion that we should stop at something corresponding to a point of intersection. But just using algebra to figure out the limits is very tricky, if possible, and one should definitely draw them to get a better and/or faster answer.

As for Halls of Ivy, it looks as if they chose the wrong bounded region, and may have in effect assumed that y=0 was an edge as well.

You may have preferred the type I because you wanted to avoid the root, but now you have to divide your integral into two separate regions. And the type II won in the end because that root never survived long, polynomials are so easy to integrate hooray!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K