Why is work done by friction negative in this problem?

1 reply · 2K views · last reply
xzibition8612
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


See attachment


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Why is it -umg(50)? Why negative? Also I think this has something to do with conservative force and friction, and I'm very confused on this. Any help would be appreciated thanks.
 
Attachments
  • Diagram of two cars skidding after a collision at point A, with compass north arrow, axes x and y, angles 30 and 45 degrees, distances 20 ft and 50 ft, and velocities v2i and v1i marked; cars end at B2 and B1.
    dwa 001.jpg
    31.2 KB · Views: 520
  • Textbook solution showing work-energy equations for Car 1 after separation: -μmg(50) = 0 - (1/2)mv1^2, giving v1 = sqrt(2(50)0.5(32.2)) = 40.1 ft/sec, and v2 = 25.4 ft/sec for Car 2.
    ewewe 001.jpg
    29.1 KB · Views: 352
xzibition8612 said:

Homework Statement


See attachment

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Why is it -umg(50)? Why negative? Also I think this has something to do with conservative force and friction, and I'm very confused on this. Any help would be appreciated thanks.

When the force is constant, Work = Force*Displacement.

In this case, it's negative because energy is being taken away from the cars by the frictional force, while they're being decelerated to a stop. The energy dissipated by friction is equal to the drop in kinetic energy (as each car comes to rest). This is conservation of energy.

μ is the coefficient of kinetic friction. mg is the weight (equal to the normal force on the car). 50ft is the distance through which car 1 moves.

BTW, there's an error in the second part of the solution. The expression for car 2 should be [itex]\sqrt{(2)(20)(0.5)(32.2)}[/itex] (i.e. 20, not 50), since 20ft is the distance car 2 takes to be brought to rest. The final stopping distance was calculated correctly, though.