Why Maxwell and Kelvin-Voigt model fail to represent a solid

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
zoala001
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

I m studying modelling the viscoelastic passive properties of vascular walls and there is question!

Why does Maxwell andKelvin-Voigt fail to represent a solid?
and also
what steps are required from a numerical point of implementation point of view , are required to turn an elastic model into a viscoelastic model?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zoala001 said:
Hi

I m studying modelling the viscoelastic passive properties of vascular walls and there is question!

Why does Maxwell andKelvin-Voigt fail to represent a solid?
Maxwell model does not exhibit strain recovery, even at small strains, so it is usually thought of as a fluid model. Kelvin-Voigt does exhibit strain recovery, so qualitatively, it behaves like a solid. However, neither of these models describes the behavior of fluids or solids quantitatively. To do that at small strains, one needs to use a more general form of these models.

and also
what steps are required from a numerical point of implementation point of view , are required to turn an elastic model into a viscoelastic model?
I don't understand this question.

Chet