Why must exponents be dimensionless?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cocopops12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Exponents must be dimensionless because they represent repeated multiplication, which does not accommodate physical dimensions like meters or kilograms. In mathematical expressions such as \(e^x\) and \(M(t) = M_0 e^{-\lambda t}\), the exponent can include variables with dimensions, but these must cancel out to yield a dimensionless result. This principle ensures that mathematical operations remain consistent and valid across different physical contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical functions and series, specifically Taylor series.
  • Familiarity with the concept of dimensions in physics, such as length, mass, and time.
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties.
  • Basic understanding of matrix exponentials and their definitions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of dimensionless quantities in physics.
  • Learn about Taylor series expansions and their applications in mathematics.
  • Explore the concept of matrix exponentials and their significance in linear algebra.
  • Investigate the role of dimensional analysis in physical equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics and physics, educators teaching dimensional analysis, and researchers exploring the foundations of mathematical modeling in physical sciences.

cocopops12
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
suppose we have ab
why must 'b' be dimensionless?

Mathematicians have defined crazy things over the centuries
so why haven't they defined this one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"Dimensions", in the sense that you are using the word (meters, kilograms, degrees celsius) are not mathematical objects, they are physical. If you are asking why no physics formula, with exponents, has no units on the exponent, you will have to ask a physicist.
 
I see, thank you sir.
 
cocopops12 said:
I see, thank you sir.

If x is a variable then you do something like:

$$e^x=\sum_n \frac{x^n}{n!}=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...$$

Now does that sum make sense if x has a dimension?

However the exponent can contain variables with dimensions but they must cancel to give a dimensionless number:

eg. $$M(t)=M_oe^{-\lambda t}$$
 
Last edited:
cocopops12 said:
suppose we have ab
why must 'b' be dimensionless?
If we restrict our attention to exponents that are positive integers, then an exponent means repeated multiplication. For example, x2 = x * x, and x3 = x * x * x.

The volume of a cube whose edge length is s is V = s3 = s * s * s. The units are tied to the variable s. All the exponent does is keep track of how many factors of s are present.
 
trollcast said:
$$e^x=\sigma_n \frac{x^n}{n!}=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...$$

I think you meant $$e^x=\sum_n \frac{x^n}{n!}=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...$$

\Sigma works, though \sum tends to work a little better.
 
Whovian said:
I think you meant $$e^x=\sum_n \frac{x^n}{n!}=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...$$

\Sigma works, though \sum tends to work a little better.

Oops, good trick with the \sum, I always wondered how to get the sigma bigger.

Fixed it now
 
There are matrix exponentials for a given matrix X of nxn dimensions defined similarly to the ordinary exponential of a number.

eX = \sum^{∞}_{k=0} \frac{1}{k!} Xk
 
trollcast said:
Oops, good trick with the \sum, I always wondered how to get the sigma bigger.

Fixed it now
Greek letters have upper and lower case forms: sigma is lowercase (##\sigma##) and
Sigma is uppercase (##\Sigma##).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K