Why Must the Transversality Condition Be Less Than or Equal to Zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The transversality condition for the function x^* that maximizes or minimizes the integral t0t1 F(t, x(t), ˙x(t)) dt must satisfy (∂F/∂˙x)t=t1 ≤ 0 when x^*(t1) = x1. This condition ensures that the functional 𝓕 does not increase with allowed variations at the boundary, thus confirming that x^* maximizes the functional locally. If x^*(t1) > x1, then the condition becomes (∂F/∂˙x)t=t1 = 0. The analysis hinges on the Euler-Lagrange equation and the nature of variations δx at the boundary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Familiarity with calculus of variations
  • Knowledge of functional analysis
  • Concept of boundary conditions in optimization problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Euler-Lagrange equation in detail
  • Explore the calculus of variations, focusing on boundary conditions
  • Investigate examples of transversality conditions in optimization
  • Learn about the implications of local maxima and minima in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in optimization problems, particularly those working with calculus of variations and boundary value problems.

Avatrin
Messages
242
Reaction score
6
Hey, I have a theorem I cannot prove.

We have a function x^* that maximizes or minimizes the integral:
\int^{t_1}_{t_0} F(t,x(t),\dot{x}(t))dt

Our end point conditions are:
x(t_0) = x_0, x(t_1) \geq x_1

I am told that x^* has to satisfy the Euler equation. That I can fully understand since x^*(t_1) can be equal to x_1. However, then it gives me the transversality condition:
\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{x}}\right)_{t=t_1} \leq 0 \text{ ( = 0 if $x^*(t_1) > x_1$)}

I can understand the statement in the parentheses. However, I do not understand why \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{x}}\right)_{t=t_1} must be less than or equal to zero if x^*(t_1) = x_1. Why can it not be more than zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The original variation of the functional (call the functional ##\mathcal F##) is given by
$$
\delta \mathcal F = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \left( \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} \delta x + \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x} \delta \dot x\right) dt.
$$
Integration by parts of the second term now leads to
$$
\delta \mathcal F = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \left( \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} - \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x} \right) \delta x \, dt
+ \left[\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x} \delta x\right]_{t=t_0}^{t_1}.
$$
Since ##\delta x## is arbitrary, the Euler-Lagrange equation has to hold if ##x## is a stationary function of the functional. This, together with ##\delta x(t_0) = 0## leads to
$$
\delta \mathcal F = \left. \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}\right|_{t=t_1} \delta x(t_1).
$$
It follows that to have a local stationary function, you must have
$$
\left. \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}\right|_{t=t_1} = 0.
$$
However, there is also the option of having a function at the boundary ##x(t_1) = x_1##. If you are at the boundary, then only variations ##\delta x(t_1) \geq 0## are allowed and therefore ##\delta \mathcal F## can only be positive if
$$
\left. \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}\right|_{t=t_1} > 0
$$
implying that the value of ##\mathcal F## would increase with the allowed variation. Your condition
$$
\left. \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}\right|_{t=t_1} \leq 0
$$
is therefore equivalent to requiring that ##\delta \mathcal F \leq 0##, i.e., that ##x^*## maximises the functional (at least locally). For a minimisation, you would get the opposite inequality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K