Why negative Rockwell Hardness value is considered as "no good"?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the reasons why negative Rockwell hardness values are not utilized in hardness testing, particularly in the context of the Rockwell C and B scales. Participants explore theoretical implications, measurement limitations, and the significance of specific values in the Rockwell hardness scale.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that negative Rockwell hardness values are avoided to prevent confusion in interpretation.
  • It is proposed that a negative value implies an indentation depth exceeding 0.26mm for the C scale, raising questions about the significance of this threshold.
  • One participant notes that a Rockwell hardness value of 130 indicates no indentation, suggesting that it represents a theoretical maximum hardness.
  • There is a discussion about whether the value of 130 was determined experimentally or extrapolated from data, with some uncertainty about the methods used to establish this value.
  • Participants mention that negative values might be possible for very soft materials, but they imply that different scales would be more appropriate for such cases.
  • The limited travel of the indenter is highlighted, with specific depths noted for the C and B scales, indicating that exceeding these depths could lead to erroneous measurements.
  • Concerns are raised about the appropriateness of the test if the indenter penetrates too deeply, which could result in nonsensical negative hardness values.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the implications of negative values and the reasons for their exclusion, indicating that there is no consensus on the matter. Some points are clarified, but uncertainty remains regarding the significance of specific values and the methodology behind them.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of hardness, the arbitrary nature of the N values, and unresolved questions regarding the experimental basis for these values.

null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1
I have read some pdf files and it says negative Rockwell hardness value is not used because of it would cause confusion.

What I currently know is :

HR(C/B) = N - h/s;

for C scale, N = 130; while for B scale N = 100;
s always = 0.002

and h is the permanent depth of the indentation.

I think these 2 addition question might related to the reason for not using negative value:

i) negative value means the indentation is like the indentation exceed 0.26mm for C scale,
0 > (130 - h/0.002); h bust be at lease 0.26mm, does this 0.26mm means anything significant?

ii) And i also read that 130 in C scale is the indicate infinite hardness, any simple way to explain why it is 130?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know about (i), but for (ii), a value of 130 means h=0, no indentation at all.
 
Thanks for your reply. Is that 130 is determined through experimenting the indentation on materials? Probably they can't get a that kind of condition to happen i guess they extrapolate the graph to 0 indentation.

Do you know the N value for other scale?

I also find that I never see negative value on the Rockwell scale, is this the reason they don't use negative value in convention?
 
Last edited:
null void said:
Thanks for your reply. Is that 130 is determined through experimenting the indentation on materials? Probably they can't get a that kind of condition to happen i guess they extrapolate the graph to 0 indentation.
It is an arbitrary value to put the hardness values in a convenient range.

I also find that I never see negative value on the Rockwell scale, is this the reason they don't use negative value in convention?
Very soft materials could have that, but I guess then you should use a different scale.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Generally, the indenter has limited travel. At .26 travel the C scale value would be zero. Similarly, a B scale indenter would bottom out at .20 travel. The indenter itself is also different. For B scale measurements, a ball bearing is normally used. For C scale measurements a conical diamond is usually the indenter. The indenter configuration varies according to the material and test type. For surface specific hardness, like case hardening, you don't want the indenter to penetrate deeper than the zone of interest, which may only be in the thousandths. If the indenter bottoms out, or you get something silly like negative hardness, you are doing the wrong test.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yeah right, the measurement become error when they penetrated too deep, thanks guys for clearing my confusion up
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
13K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K