Why no change of variable to polar coordinates inside multi-loop integral ?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
why no change of variable to polar coordinates inside multi-loop integral ??

given a mul,ti-loop integral

[tex]\int d^{4}k_{1} \int d^{4}k_{2}....\int d^{4}k_{n}f(k_{1} , k_{2},...,k_{n})[/tex]

which can be considered a 4n integral for integer n , my question is why can just this be evaluated by using a change of variable to 4n- polar coordinates ?

one we have made a change of variable and calculated the Jacobian, and integrated over ALL the angular variables we just have to make an integral

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty}drg(r)r^{4n-1}[/tex] which is just easier to handle
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't what specific integral you have in mind, but it depends very much on the form of f as it depends on the k's. You seem to imply that it can be represented as a function g of one variable. This may be true for some particular f, but it certainly is not true in general.
 


for example

[tex]\iint dx dy \frac{x^{3}}{1+xy}[/tex] its divergent if taking the limits (0,oo)

making a change of variable to polar coordinates one gets

[tex]\int du \int_{0}^{\infty}dr\frac{r^{4}cos^{3}(u)}{1+(1/2)r^{2}sin(2u)}[/tex]

integrating over the angular variable 'u' you have now a simple one dimensional integral
 


In general if you have an m dimensional integral and integrate over m-1 dimensions, you will have a one dimensional integral. In your general case (4n) I am not sure what you mean by polar coordinates.

This question belongs in the mathematics forum. There isn't apparent connection with Beyond the Standard Model (physics).
 
Last edited: