Why nobel prize is awarded for blue led invention .?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons for awarding the Nobel Prize for the invention of blue LEDs, including the timing of the award in relation to the actual invention and the historical context of Nobel Prize awards in general.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Nobel Prizes are awarded for achievements made long before the award is given, often decades earlier.
  • One participant mentions that the first working blue LEDs were created in the early 1990s, indicating a long development process.
  • Another participant points out that the original statutes of the Nobel Prize may have required awards for innovations from the previous year, but this has changed over time.
  • There are references to other Nobel laureates, such as Peter Higgs and S. Chandrasekhar, whose awards were given many years after their discoveries.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the timing of the Peace Prize, suggesting it is awarded prematurely.
  • A participant recalls that earlier theories suggested blue LEDs should be possible, but they were not successfully produced until later, highlighting theoretical limitations of the time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Nobel Prizes are awarded for past achievements, but there is no consensus on the specifics of the timing and the historical context of these awards.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific timelines and historical examples, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these timelines on the awarding of the Nobel Prize.

Ganesh Ujwal
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
why nobel prize is awarded for blue led invention even though it was invented before?
i bought this blue led 2 years back i.e on 2012,

asdasd_zpsd03dc90e.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobel Prizes aren't awarded immediately. They are being acknowledged for something that they did 20 years ago.
 
All Nobel prizes are awarded for achievements or discoveries made before.
It's not an award for something done recently (or in the previous year). It may for something done 20 years ago.

Edit.
Funny. I wrote 20 years too even though I was writing while Danger were posting already.:)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pechan and Danger
Getting a Nobel Prize is not like opening a box of Cracker Jacks and finding one inside.

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2014/popular-physicsprize2014.pdf

It took more than three decades of work to produce blue LEDs. The first working blue LEDs were created in the early 1990s.
 
nasu said:
It's not an award for something done recently (or in the previous year)
One exception to that is the Peace Prize, which is usually quite current as is demonstrated by this year's deserving co-winners.
 
Yes, you are right. I did not think about it but just the physics one.
 
I think that in the original statutes, it had to be awarded for an innovation of the last year, but this has been changed long ago.
 
Google suggests the longest wait from original research to prize is 38 years. That went to Ralph Steinman in 2011 for work he did in 1973.
 
  • #10
Hm, Peter Higgs wrote his paper in 1964 and got his Nobel prize in 2013.
 
  • #11
How could I forget him! So that's 49 years!

Although his was delayed because it took that long to prove he was correct.
 
  • #12
DrDu said:
I think that in the original statutes, it had to be awarded for an innovation of the last year, but this has been changed long ago.
If it was, they broke the rule from the beginning, with the first prize in physics which was given to Roentgen in 1901 for the x-rays discovered in 1896.Not 20 years, true. They were faster then. :)
 
  • #13
S.Chandrasekhar also got it I think after 50 years for his discovery about chandrashekhar limit.(fate of stars below 1.4 solar masses etc...)
 
  • #14
Every physicist does not target prize.Genuine explorers carry on and enjoy their work.
 
  • #15
Damned Peace Prize seems to get awarded before there's any evidence of peace at all. (I haven't noticed a lot of it around, lately)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nathanael
  • #16
I remember my electronics textbook in the 70s said of LEDs that, theoretically, the only color they should produce is blue, yet up until that time blue was the one color no one had been able to produce.

Clearly, the theory of the day had its shortcomings, too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kashan123999

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
14K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K