Why normal force always prependicular?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 7K views
supremesaiyan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
why normal force always perpendicular?
why doesn't be in the same direction of the affecting force?
like a mass on a sliding wall why doesn't be opposite the direction of the weight?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Normal is a mathematical term that means perpendicular.

The normal reaction that you seem to be referring to is called normal since it acts perpendicular to the bodies weight (e.g. the normal force on a book by the table it is sitting on is perpendicular to the book). Hence, it is in the opposite direction of the applied force (the objects weight in this case).

CS
 
arildno said:
Oops, stewartcs:

A normal force acts perpendicularly with respect to a given surface onto some object in contact with that surface.

Isn't that what I said?

CS
 
stewartcs said:
Isn't that what I said?

CS

stewartcs said:
Normal is a mathematical term that means perpendicular.

The normal reaction that you seem to be referring to is called normal since it acts perpendicular to the bodies weight (e.g. the normal force on a book by the table it is sitting on is perpendicular to the book). Hence, it is in the opposite direction of the applied force (the objects weight in this case).

CS

You say:
1.
The normal reaction that you seem to be referring to is called normal since it acts perpendicular to the bodies weight
This doesn't have much meaning; normal since it is PERPENDICULAR to the body's weight??

It is normal to the surface if the wall is vertical, and INCIDENTALLY normal to the body's weight.

2.
(e.g. the normal force on a book by the table it is sitting on is perpendicular to the book)
How can anything be perpendicular to a BOOK??

3.
Hence, it is in the opposite direction of the applied force (the objects weight in this case).
Now, you contradict yourself with respect to the example in 1, and not the least in the OP's question:
like a mass on a sliding wall why doesn't be opposite the direction of the weight?
 
arildno said:
You say:
1.
This doesn't have much meaning; normal since it is PERPENDICULAR to the body's weight??

It is normal to the surface if the wall is vertical, and INCIDENTALLY normal to the body's weight.

2.
How can anything be perpendicular to a BOOK??

3.
Now, you contradict yourself with respect to the example in 1, and not the least in the OP's question:

Oh...LOL...I see what you mean...that did come out wrong initially...

My example is of a book lying flat on a table. The book has some weight (mg) to it. There is a normal force from the table (opposite in direction from mg) applied to the surface of the book which is lying horizontally on the table. Thus making the normal force perpendicular to the surface of the book.

CS
 
As mentioned in math and physics, normal means perpendicular to something, either a surface or direction of travel.

Forces aren't always "normal", but generally forces can be separated into components tangental and perpendicular to a surface.

In the case of an object moving in a specific direction, then the perpendicular component to a line is a plane, so you need additional criteria to separate the components of force on that plane. In some cases, like an electron moving in a magnetic, the electron has a direction, the field has a direction, and the normal force has the remaining direction.