Why Permanganate Isn't a Coordination Compound

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chemist20
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
Chemist20
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Okay, simple and probably stupid question: why is permanganate not a coordination compound?after all it's a metal and oxygens which can act as ligands right?

thank you!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Chemist20 said:
Okay, simple and probably stupid question: why is permanganate not a coordination compound?after all it's a metal and oxygens which can act as ligands right?

thank you!

What makes you think it isn't?
 
Chemist20 said:
Okay, simple and probably stupid question: why is permanganate not a coordination compound?after all it's a metal and oxygens which can act as ligands right?

thank you!

It's not simple nor stupid at all. Coordination compounds are defined rather through their fomation than their actual bonding properties. Usually coordinate covalent bonding is understood as a transfer of lone electron pair of a donor ligand (can be ion or neutral molecule) to a bond with central (acceptor) atom. Permanganate is not considered a coordination compound, since no chemist would think of it as a product of Mn7+ cation and 4 O2- anions.
 
asym said:
It's not simple nor stupid at all. Coordination compounds are defined rather through their fomation than their actual bonding properties. Usually coordinate covalent bonding is understood as a transfer of lone electron pair of a donor ligand (can be ion or neutral molecule) to a bond with central (acceptor) atom. Permanganate is not considered a coordination compound, since no chemist would think of it as a product of Mn7+ cation and 4 O2- anions.

ooooh okay, I see. So what would it be then?
 
Chemist20 said:
ooooh okay, I see. So what would it be then?
Just ordinary inorganic anion, no need for a special name.