Why satellite needed to launched in prescribed height and orbit

Click For Summary
Satellites are launched into specific orbits based on their intended functions, with sun-synchronous orbits favored for mapping to ensure consistent revisit times. Geostationary orbits are ideal for communication and certain weather satellites, maintaining a constant position over the same area. Molnyia orbits, with a semi-synchronous 12-hour period, are used for polar coverage, particularly by countries with challenging geostationary access. Higher orbits reduce atmospheric drag, extending satellite lifespan but increasing launch costs and decreasing sensor resolution. The choice of orbit ultimately depends on the satellite's mission requirements.
dijinj
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What are the reasons for satellite to be launched to outer atmospheric orbits... Is reduction in air friction a major reason, or is it just an added advantage. I know escape velocity has Major reason in it , what are other major reason for chosing particular orbit for a sate
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what you want the satellite to do:
  • If you want to do mapping work, you will almost always use a sun-synchronous orbit, going over the poles within a fairly low and narrow altitude range, which gives you the ability to revisit areas at the same time of day every day.
  • If you want to keep your satellite over the same patch of ground at all times, you need a geostationary orbit, taking 24 hours to complete an orbit. Perfect for communication satellites, but also used for certain weather satellites that give you a picture of more than a third of the planet at once.
  • Molnyia or tundra orbits are somewhat odd orbit in that they are semi-synchronous, i.e. they have a 12 hour period. They’re usually highly inclined as well to put their high points up over the polar regions. Originally pioneered by the USSR for their civilian communications satellites since it was both too difficult for them to achieve a proper geostationary orbit and because they are so far north that having a geostationary satellite is wasteful due to poor polar coverage.
  • Mid-level orbits are used mostly for navigation satellites. GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidu.
The higher the orbit, the lower the drag, and therefore the longer the expected service life without reboost. But they’re also more costly to access for a given payload mass, and provide lower sensor resolution for mapping work.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes russ_watters, Klystron, berkeman and 3 others
Flyboy said:
It depends on what you want the satellite to do:
  • If you want to do mapping work, you will almost always use a sun-synchronous orbit, going over the poles within a fairly low and narrow altitude range, which gives you the ability to revisit areas at the same time of day every day.
  • If you want to keep your satellite over the same patch of ground at all times, you need a geostationary orbit, taking 24 hours to complete an orbit. Perfect for communication satellites, but also used for certain weather satellites that give you a picture of more than a third of the planet at once.
  • Molnyia or tundra orbits are somewhat odd orbit in that they are semi-synchronous, i.e. they have a 12 hour period. They’re usually highly inclined as well to put their high points up over the polar regions. Originally pioneered by the USSR for their civilian communications satellites since it was both too difficult for them to achieve a proper geostationary orbit and because they are so far north that having a geostationary satellite is wasteful due to poor polar coverage.
  • Mid-level orbits are used mostly for navigation satellites. GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidu.
The higher the orbit, the lower the drag, and therefore the longer the expected service life without reboost. But they’re also more costly to access for a given payload mass, and provide lower sensor resolution for mapping work.
Thank you
 
its always been a dream of mine to visit the stars and now that I'm old enough and in a levels i wanted to send a bit of myself to space in a rocked like a hair or something but I've ran into some problems and came here to ask for your opinions on what fuel i should use and what material i should use the the shell of rocket as am only in first year a levels so any suggestions would be much appreciated and the fuel will take up about 90 percent mass and launch the rocket about 830Km the maths...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 271 ·
10
Replies
271
Views
26K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K