Why someone cannot raise him/herself up by holding the hair?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rosalux
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hair
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the question of why a person cannot lift themselves by pulling on their own hair, focusing on the forces involved and the principles of physics that govern such actions. Participants explore concepts related to Newton's laws of motion and the mechanics of force application in various scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that the force applied to lift oneself is countered by an equal and opposite force, resulting in no net upward movement.
  • Others argue that the action-reaction forces involved when pulling on one's hair do not involve an external force, thus preventing any change in altitude relative to the Earth.
  • A participant introduces the idea that if the hair were long enough to go over a pulley, one could pull down and effectively lift themselves, introducing an external force into the scenario.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of distinguishing between forces acting within a closed system and those that involve external forces, referencing Newton's Third Law of motion.
  • A later reply discusses the concept of the center of mass and how it cannot be accelerated without an external force, further elaborating on the mechanics involved.
  • Another participant mentions the relevance of Newton's First Law of Motion in understanding the situation, although this point is met with mixed responses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the application of Newton's laws to the scenario, but there are competing views regarding the role of external forces and the implications of action-reaction pairs. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nuances of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for clarity on what is meant by "raising oneself up" and the assumptions about the system being closed or open to external forces. The discussion also highlights the complexity of force interactions in different contexts.

rosalux
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can someone please answer this question in terms of the forces acting?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force that you apply to lift something is equally applied pushing your body down, the harder you pull your head up, the more force you push your body down... since they are connecting you just wind up stretching your neck
 
Your hand pulls your hair and your hair pulls your hand with the same magnitude of force.In the end the forces on you cancel out.
 
So that is because of the applier of the force and the object to which the force is applied are the same? I understand that the action and reaction forces cancel each other out but this is also true for a force that is applied by another person.

That is just like the case when someone tries to push a bus when he/she is in the bus. What is the physical explanation for this, is there any law -say- to name that case?
 
rosalux said:
So that is because of the applier of the force and the object to which the force is applied are the same?
Something like that. The problem lies in the wording: "raise yourself up". Raise yourself up relative to what? We have to assume you mean relative to the earth. That being the case, why should a pull you exert directly on your hair be expected to change your altitude with respect to the earth? To change your altitude with respect to the Earth you really have to exert a force against the earth, somehow. By stepping up onto a staircase that's sitting on the earth, for example.

Likewise with the bus. You can't make the bus move relative to the ground by applying forces that act exclusively between you and the bus. If you do that, the only change you'll get will be limited to changes between you and the bus. To make the bus move relative to the ground you have to apply forces that act between the bus and the ground.

When the bus is stuck and the men come out and push on the bus, it is not really men against bus, but ground against bus, and bus against ground: the men are acting as intermediaries between the bus and the ground. Their arms act against the bus and their feet act against the ground. If they are successful, the bus will move relative to the ground.

When you pull on your hair, the hair pulls back on your hand. That is what Newton's Third Law is about. The ground, the earth, is not involved in this action-reaction pair of the hair and the hand that pulls it. If you lift someone else by the hair, though, you are the intermediary between them and the ground. Therefore, they move relative to the ground.

The law you need is Newton's Third Law of motion. You just need to be careful about determining what is really acting against what in each case.
 
If the hair was long enough(!) to be passed over a pulley attached to the ceiling you could pull DOWN and pull yourself up !
 
rosalux said:
I understand that the action and reaction forces cancel each other out but this is also true for a force that is applied by another person.
No, it isn't. One scenario has two forces (one force pair) and the other has four.
 
technician said:
If the hair was long enough(!) to be passed over a pulley attached to the ceiling you could pull DOWN and pull yourself up !

But then you introduce an external force, from the pulley/ceiling/earth.
 
rosalux said:
Why someone cannot raise him/herself up by holding the hair? Can someone please answer this question in terms of the forces acting?
When you pull on your own hair, any upwards force on your hair will be opposed by a downwards force at your shoulder. This involves two sets of Newton third law pairs of forces: 1 - your hand exerts an upwards force on your hair, and your hair exerts a downwards force on your hand; 2 - your arm exerts a downwards force on your shoulder, and your shoulder exerts an upwards force on your arm.

A more general rule is the center of mass of any closed system can't be accelerated without an external force.
 
  • #10
Nasu has it exactly.
In the original statement there is no EXTERNAL force acting on the system.
With the hair (or a rope) over a pulley there is an external force because of the pulley attached to the ceiling.
 
  • #11
Thank you for your answers. zoobyshoe, i really appreciate.
 
  • #12
Newton's First Law of Motion puts it very well.
 
  • #13
sophiecentaur said:
Newton's First Law of Motion puts it very well.
Damn, you're right.

Reminds me of the movie "Sling Blade". Autistic guy has a reputation of being a "genius" at fixing lawnmowers. Guy brings him his lawnmower, complaining it just quit and won't work anymore. Autistic guy looks it over unscrewing this and that and announces "It's outta gas."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
712
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K