Why string theory doesn't explane all?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the limitations of string theory, particularly regarding its ability to explain black hole singularities and its status as a "theory of everything." Participants explore various conceptual and phenomenological challenges associated with string theory, including its implications for quantum gravity and the nature of the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the appropriateness of calling string theory a "theory of everything," arguing that it does not address existential questions or the nature of the universe.
  • Another participant suggests that string theory has conjectures that may explain black hole singularities, but acknowledges that much work remains to be done, leaving the matter uncertain.
  • A different participant raises concerns about string theory's ability to address fundamental problems in quantum gravity, such as background independence and the problem of time, stating that these issues remain unresolved.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the completeness of string theory, citing the lack of definitive tests and the complexity of the theory as barriers to its validation.
  • One participant notes the ongoing challenges in understanding the dynamics of string theory and its implications for gravity, highlighting several specific problems that need to be addressed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some agreeing on the limitations of string theory while others propose that it may still hold potential for explaining certain phenomena. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the efficacy and completeness of string theory.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various conceptual problems and limitations within string theory, such as the lack of a background-independent formulation and the challenges in defining the classical theory of gravity within the framework of string theory. These issues contribute to the ongoing debate about the theory's status and completeness.

ryanuser
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Why string field theory doesn't explane a black singularity but its called the theory of everything?

It just explanes quantum gravity not why the universe exists or why we exist, what I am tring to say is that it should not be called the theory of everything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think it doesn't explain a Black Hole singularity? My understanding is a number of conjectures within string theory (eg its made out of strings) does explain it but much more work needs to be done - right now its up in the air.

For example check out:
http://athome.harvard.edu/programs/sst/video/sst1_6.html

Its called a theory of everything because of what it attempts do do - whether it is or not remains to be seen.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
String theory, besides Phenomenological problems such as supersymmetry and extra dimensions, is far from a theory deserves to be called a theory of everything!
it doesn't explain quantum gravity as you said because QG has a number of conceptual problems such as "the problem of background independence", "the problem of time", etc that string theory doesnt' have any answer to them. for example the current consensus in fundamental physics community is that if a theory of QG exists, it must be background independent so if QG be a QFT, one must define a generally covariant QFT without background which is a concept that is not properly formulated (I guess there are several attempts in LQG community) because it is very different from conventional QFT's and there is no background indepedndent formulation of string theory and some attemps to construct such a theory using simpler models such as topological strings theory and topological M-theory hasn't been so successful! there was a hope in the last years started at mid 80's that when one quantized string theory in the spectrum of resulting theory, there are particles behave like a spin 2 particle like graviton and some gauge fields like Yang-Mills and in this sense string theory is a theory of QG which seems more like a joke! these are outside problems that string theory must face beside some inside problems of the string theory itself! for example :

1) the problem of number of vacuum solutions of M-Theory;
2) one doesn't not know what is the classical theory of gravity in string theory because in classical sting theory, one doesn't have gravity at all! like YM theories that approximated by Nonlinear Born-Infeld fields
3) the dynamics of second quantized string theory (string fields) hasn't been understood except some simple ones such as Witten cubic open string field theory
and ...

so it is far from a complete theory if it be a well-defined theory at all!
 
Last edited:
String theory is so complicated no [realistic] definitive test has yet even been proposed. It's such a slippery eel, it appears bulletproof. The real question, IMO, is whether it's even definable.
 
Its strange after decades we still couldn't figure them out, even there is a theory.
 
The word is 'explain', or 'splain if you are in a hurry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K