Why true strain is always smaller than nominal strain in tensile test?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In tensile testing, true strain (εt) is consistently smaller than nominal strain (εn) due to the difference in how each is calculated. True strain accounts for the actual change in length relative to the instantaneous length of the specimen, while nominal strain uses the original length. This discrepancy arises because as the material is stretched, its cross-sectional area decreases, leading to a smaller actual length increase compared to the theoretical increase. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurate material analysis in Mechanics of Materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensile testing principles
  • Familiarity with strain and stress definitions
  • Knowledge of Mechanics of Materials concepts
  • Basic grasp of material deformation behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between true stress and nominal stress in tensile tests
  • Learn about the calculation of true strain versus nominal strain
  • Research the effects of cross-sectional area changes during material deformation
  • Explore atomic forces and their impact on material properties during tensile testing
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students studying Mechanics of Materials, materials engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of strain measurements in tensile testing.

HongTechnology
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Why true strain is always smaller than nominal strain in tensile test?

Is that mean that actual length increase is smaller than theoretical length increase?

Is it related to atomic forces?
Hi everyone.

I'm studying Mechanics of Materials and I got some question about 'nominal/true strain'.

First of all, I agree that in tensile test, nominal stress is always smaller than true stress

σt > σn

cause when the material specimen is being stretched, then the actual area of the specimen at the cross section would be decreased.

However, I wonder why nominal strain is always larger than true strain in tensile test. εt < εn

If I'm right, I guess that statement implies that actual length increase would be smaller than theoretical length increase.

cause ε=δ/L, am I right?

If I'm right, what factor is the main reason for that truth? Is it related to the atomic forces?

p.s. I just started to use this PhysicsForums, so I wonder if it is okay to upload questions here.

If I did wrong, I would appreciate if you tell me where should I upload questions. I'm not very good at english TT.

Anyway, thanks for reading my question.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ah, I think I misunderstood the definition of each of them. It was a simple thing haha;
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K