Why true strain is always smaller than nominal strain in tensile test?

HongTechnology
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Why true strain is always smaller than nominal strain in tensile test?

Is that mean that actual length increase is smaller than theoretical length increase?

Is it related to atomic forces?
Hi everyone.

I'm studying Mechanics of Materials and I got some question about 'nominal/true strain'.

First of all, I agree that in tensile test, nominal stress is always smaller than true stress

σt > σn

cause when the material specimen is being stretched, then the actual area of the specimen at the cross section would be decreased.

However, I wonder why nominal strain is always larger than true strain in tensile test. εt < εn

If I'm right, I guess that statement implies that actual length increase would be smaller than theoretical length increase.

cause ε=δ/L, am I right?

If I'm right, what factor is the main reason for that truth? Is it related to the atomic forces?

p.s. I just started to use this PhysicsForums, so I wonder if it is okay to upload questions here.

If I did wrong, I would appreciate if you tell me where should I upload questions. I'm not very good at english TT.

Anyway, thanks for reading my question.
 
on Phys.org
Ah, I think I misunderstood the definition of each of them. It was a simple thing haha;
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K