Why wind turbines don't have their dynamos closer to ground?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the placement of wind turbine generators, questioning why they are typically mounted high rather than closer to the ground. While placing the generator lower could simplify maintenance and reduce tower weight, the increased length of the drive shaft introduces frictional losses that may negate these benefits. The weight of the generator is minor compared to the overall stresses the tower faces from wind forces. Additionally, a longer shaft could complicate the turbine's ability to effectively point into the wind due to torque issues. Ultimately, the design choices prioritize stability and efficiency over maintenance convenience.
kevin_tee
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
bcwHMZB.png

Why don't the electric generator mount closer to the ground. The advantage I can think is that it is easy to maintain(no need to climb) and reduce weight(reduce tower cost), however the extended shaft will cost more. Does the longer shaft cost out weight the easier maintenance and generator weight? Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why would the generator weigh less if you put it on the ground instead of up near the top?
 
You make a good point that the tower could weigh less with the generator at the bottom. My guess is that the frictional losses in the 90-degree gear drive must "outweigh" that weight advantage.

If the turbine were on a vertical axis (as some are), that wouldn't be a problem. I don't think that's as efficient though.
 
Drakkith said:
Why would the generator weigh less if you put it on the ground instead of up near the top?
I am referring to the weight that the tower need to support.
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith
Randy Beikmann said:
You make a good point that the tower could weigh less with the generator at the bottom. My guess is that the frictional losses in the 90-degree gear drive must "outweigh" that weight advantage.

If the turbine were on a vertical axis (as some are), that wouldn't be a problem. I don't think that's as efficient though.

I see, so there are quite a lot of friction there.
 
In most designs the actual generator is only one part of the total equipment needed at the tower head . A lot of the equipment would still have to be up there even if you moved the generator to the tower base .

Illustration
 
kevin_tee said:
I am referring to the weight that the tower need to support.

The weight of the generator and what this adds to the tower requirements is minor compared to the wind stresses the tower and turbine have to deal with. The weight of the drive shaft would probably be higher, plus the tower would also have to deal with the reaction torque.
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters and Randy Beikmann
If a long vertical drive shaft was used with insufficient bearings in the tower, it would twirl.

A right-angle gearbox driving a vertical shaft would apply a torque to the tower head that would make the head harder to point into the wind.

The forces on the blades from the wind will probably be greater than the weight of the generator. Maybe more mass in the tower makes the tower more stable and less resonant at some wind speeds.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top