1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why would we ignore initial angular velocity in equation?

  1. Nov 22, 2015 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A 1.15-kg grinding wheel 22.0 cm in diameter is spinning counterclockwise at a rate of 20.0 revolutions per second. When the power to the grinder is turned off, the grinding wheel slows with constant angular acceleration and takes 80.0 s to come to a rest.
    (a) What was the angular acceleration (in rad/s2) of the grinding wheel as it came to rest if we take a counterclockwise rotation as positive?
    A: -1.57 rad/s2
    (b) How many revolutions did the wheel make during the time it was coming to rest?
    A: 800 revolutions

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution
    (a) [tex]
    \omega_f=\omega_0+\alpha t\\
    0 = (20 * 2\pi) + 80\alpha\\
    \alpha = -\frac{20 * 2\pi}{80}\\
    \alpha = -1.57 \frac{\texttt{rad}}{\texttt{s}^2}
    (b) This is where I am confused. Why do we assume w0=0 to get the answer?[tex]
    \theta = \omega_0 t + \frac{1}{2} t^2 \alpha\\
    \theta = \frac{1}{2} t^2 \alpha\\
    \theta = \frac{1}{2} (80)^2 (\frac{-1.57}{2\pi})\\
    \theta = 800 \ \texttt{revolutions}
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 22, 2015 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    There are two forms of that equation, ##\theta=\omega_0 t+\frac 12 \alpha t^2## or ##\theta=\omega_f t-\frac 12 \alpha t^2##.
    In the present case, it would have been natural to use the second form. Note that alpha as calculated is negative.
    But by considering time in reverse you can swap ##\omega_0## and ##\omega_f## and negate the signs on theta and alpha.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Why would we ignore initial angular velocity in equation?