Width of a stationary wave packet as a function of time

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a stationary wave packet over time, particularly focusing on whether the width of the wave packet increases linearly with time. Participants explore the implications of different potential forms in the context of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the width of a spreading wave packet should grow linearly with time, suggesting that the answer may depend on the specific form of the wave packet and the Hamiltonian operator.
  • One participant specifies that they are discussing the time-dependent behavior of a Gaussian wave packet, referencing the Hamiltonian operator.
  • Another participant notes that if the potential V(x) is unknown, it complicates the determination of the wave packet's time evolution, and even known potentials may not allow for analytical solutions.
  • In the case where V(x) is zero, a participant explains that this corresponds to a free particle, which can be solved analytically in momentum space, detailing the mathematical steps involved in the evolution of the wave packet over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the wave packet's width and time, with some suggesting linear growth under certain conditions while others emphasize the dependence on the potential form. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the general behavior of the wave packet's width over time.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations related to the unknown potential and the specific forms of wave packets that may or may not allow for analytical solutions.

Bernard
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Trivial question: If a wave-packet is spreading with time, should the width of the wave-packet grow linearly with time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bernard said:
Trivial question: If a wave-packet is spreading with time, should the width of the wave-packet grow linearly with time?
Not so trivial as the answer depends on the form of the wavepacket itself as well as the Hamiltonian operator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
i am talking about a time dependent behaviour of a gaussian wave-packet. -\frac{h^2}{2m}\frac{∂^2}{∂x}+Vx
 
What does ##Vx## mean?
 
I meant V(x) that is the potential. Part of the hamiltonian of the time dependent shrodinger equation
 
If ##V(x)## is unknown, it's impossible to determine the way the wavepacket evolves in time. Even if it is given, only very few forms allow us to perform the calculation analytically.
 
Ok so if V(x) is zero?
 
##V(x)=0## corresponds to a free particle and it can be solved analytically in momentum space. Suppose your initial wavepacket is ##|\psi_0\rangle##. The wavepacket at time ##t## is ##|\psi(t)\rangle = \exp(\frac{-iHt}{\hbar}) |\psi_0\rangle## where ##H = p^2/(2m)##. Then use the completeness relation in momentum basis
$$
|\psi(t)\rangle = \int dp' \hspace{2mm} e^{\frac{-iHt}{\hbar}} |p'\rangle \langle p'|\psi_0\rangle
$$
Now just plug in the initial Gaussian wavepacket in momentum space ##\psi(p,0) =\langle p|\psi_0\rangle## and compute the integral. From this point on, it's up to you whether you want to express the final state in position or in momentum basis. The momentum basis representation is easy, you just need to calculate
$$
\langle p|\psi(t)\rangle = \int dp' \hspace{2mm} \langle p|e^{\frac{-iHt}{\hbar}} |p'\rangle \langle p'|\psi_0\rangle
$$
Since ##e^{\frac{-iHt}{\hbar}} |p'\rangle = e^{\frac{-i\hat{p}^2t}{2m\hbar}} |p'\rangle = e^{\frac{-ip'^2t}{2m\hbar}} |p'\rangle##, the above equation becomes
$$
\langle p|\psi(t)\rangle = \int dp' \hspace{2mm} e^{\frac{-ip'^2t}{2m\hbar}} \langle p|p'\rangle \langle p'|\psi_0\rangle = e^{\frac{-ip^2t}{2m\hbar}} \langle p|\psi_0\rangle
$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Mentz114

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K