WiFi Signal Strength and Computer Orientation

Click For Summary
WiFi signal strength is influenced by antenna orientation, with significant differences in strength observed between horizontal and vertical polarization, potentially reaching 25-30 dB. However, in typical short-range WiFi scenarios, reflections from surrounding objects often mitigate these differences, making orientation less critical. Some laptops may utilize advanced antenna designs that improve signal reception across various orientations. Additionally, technologies like IEEE 802.11n allow for multiple antennas to enhance overall signal strength. Understanding these factors can help users optimize their WiFi experience.
Natanijel
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hello everybody :)

This is my first post! I have a mystery about radio communication that I was wondering about for a long time:

If I have understood correctly, most computers have a single WiFi antenna in the shape of a rod, which is placed in a particular orientation. My question is this: why does the WiFi signal strength seem to be unaffected by the orientation of the antenna even though the voltage induced will depend on the direction and polarisation of the WiFi radio waves? For example, my laptop (as far as I know) has a single antenna in the plane of the keyboard, and if I rotate my computer through many angles, my signal strength is unaltered.

Could it be that there are multiple (maybe 3) radio receivers that are positioned perpendicular to each other for optimum radio wave capture? Or maybe the router has 3 perpendicular transmitters?

Thanks a lot for your help!
Nat :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Signal strength does depend on the orientation, but the difference is small compared to other issues like walls.
 
  • Like
Likes Natanijel
mfb said:
Signal strength does depend on the orientation, but the difference is small compared to other issues like walls.
Thanks for the reply :)
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
mfb said:
Signal strength does depend on the orientation, but the difference is small compared to other issues like walls.

there is a huge difference in signal strength dependent on antenna orientation, the difference between horizontal and vertical polarisation is around 25 - 30 dB

Over the short distances that WiFi is used, several 10's of metres, it is as mfb said, not too much of an issue due to all the reflections of other objects
Over longer distances kilometres ++ it makes a major difference and matched antenna orientation is a must

Dave

PS ... nice to see you return after many months with a response :smile:
so many never bother to ever come back with a thanks
hope to see more of you on the Physics Forums :smile:
 
davenn said:
there is a huge difference in signal strength dependent on antenna orientation, the difference between horizontal and vertical polarisation is around 25 - 30 dB
That may be true for some sort of dipole, but I believe there are other more complicated antenna designs available that can get closer to an ideal isotropic radiator, something I would guess computer manufacturers may take advantage of.
 
davenn said:
there is a huge difference in signal strength dependent on antenna orientation, the difference between horizontal and vertical polarisation is around 25 - 30 dB
One of the features of IEEE 802.11n is the optional use of multiple antennas in order to get a better signal strength.
 
  • Like
Likes Natanijel
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K