Will a Math degree be applicable to Physics research?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the applicability of a Mathematics degree to Physics research, exploring the potential for mathematicians to contribute to physical understanding and the pathways for transitioning from mathematics to physics graduate studies. The scope includes theoretical implications, educational pathways, and the nature of interdisciplinary work between mathematics and physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that mathematicians can contribute to physics through mathematical physics, particularly in areas like partial differential equations (PDEs) related to physical problems.
  • Others argue that while mathematicians may work on problems with physical implications, their focus is often more abstract and not necessarily tied to physical reality.
  • A participant suggests that transitioning to physics later is feasible if one completes necessary lab courses, emphasizing the importance of foundational physics coursework.
  • Another participant challenges the characterization of mathematicians and physicists, asserting that theoretical physics and mathematics are closely related and that it is possible to move from mathematics to a physics career.
  • Some participants emphasize the need for core physics courses to facilitate a transition from mathematics to physics graduate studies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between mathematics and physics, particularly regarding the nature of interest and relevance in their respective fields. There is no consensus on the best pathway for a mathematician to transition into physics research, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of what constitutes relevant coursework and the differing roles of mathematicians and physicists in research contexts. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the nature of interdisciplinary work.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a career that bridges mathematics and physics, students exploring interdisciplinary studies, and those interested in the nature of research contributions from different academic backgrounds.

James23
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone. I am currently working on a BS in Mathematics and I am also doing some physics coursework. I am fairly sure that I am going to pursue Math up to the graduate level. My ultimate goal is to do some sort of research that adds something to our understanding of the physical universe. I know that is the job of a Physicist but I was curious if a Mathematician could do the same in some way. I would even consider getting my degrees in Mathematics and then returning to pursue Physics at a later time since a double-major isn't feasible for me as of now. So the short version of my question is how can a Mathematician help to discover new ideas about the physical universe and how could someone with a Math degree transition into graduate Physics? I appreciate any insight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, the short answer is yes with an asterisk. Mathematical physics, and in particular the study of PDE's, is directly related to physical problems. One of mathematics professors in the analysis group at my university has a NSF grant to study energy decay of the wave equation on black hole backgrounds (apparently a hot topic in analysis right now), and others in the group study the Schrödinger equation and other such physically inspired problems.

But I say with an asterisk because these guys are mathematicians through and through. There is no overlap (besides the fact that physics and math are in the same building). They couldn't wake up the next day and decide they'd rather be a physics professor. And not just because the academy doesn't work that way, but because they're literally that far from being a physicist. For instance, I asked one of them about the physical implications of his problem, what it really means physically, and he was basically like "I have no idea nor do I care."

Not saying that in a bad way, you just have to understand that mathematicians care about things in a different way than physicists. They don't find it interesting because it represents reality, they find it interesting just for the hell of it. And physicists don't really care if it makes logical sense, just as long as it agrees with experiment and gives the correct result in the range of values they're concerned with.
 
And to answer you question about switching over to physics later on, I'd say the only way this would be possible is if you still take a lot of the lab courses at this level.
 
"I am currently working on a BS in Mathematics and I am also doing some physics coursework."

It's quite simple, actually. Do plenty of physics coursework, and you'll be a double major in math and physics. Assume that every physics course you miss now is something you'll have to make up for later on. Make up for what you miss, and you can do research in physics. (This isn't always the case, but if you plan on going to grad school in physics it's a good rule of thumb.)
 
Not saying that in a bad way, you just have to understand that mathematicians care about things in a different way than physicists. They don't find it interesting because it represents reality, they find it interesting just for the hell of it. And physicists don't really care if it makes logical sense, just as long as it agrees with experiment and gives the correct result in the range of values they're concerned with.
I object to this characterization, it's far from the truth. It sounds like "physicist" for diligence has the same meaning as "experimental physicist" (and then still...), which would also explain his 2nd post encouraging lots of lab work: lab work is quite inessential for theoretical physicsts.

So yeah, theoretical physics and math are very close, and contrary to diligence's claim, it's perfectly possible to start in math and become a professor in physics (proof: some of my physics professors). Just take the core physics courses: classical mechanics, EM, quantum, relativity, statistical (if not now, then at least eventually).

That being said, what I have said and can say isn't very specific.
 
James23 said:
Hello Everyone. I am currently working on a BS in Mathematics and I am also doing some physics coursework. I am fairly sure that I am going to pursue Math up to the graduate level. My ultimate goal is to do some sort of research that adds something to our understanding of the physical universe. I know that is the job of a Physicist but I was curious if a Mathematician could do the same in some way. I would even consider getting my degrees in Mathematics and then returning to pursue Physics at a later time since a double-major isn't feasible for me as of now. So the short version of my question is how can a Mathematician help to discover new ideas about the physical universe and how could someone with a Math degree transition into graduate Physics? I appreciate any insight!

If you want to do research in physics, then an undergraduate degree in physics would be best. Is it possible to do what you're proposing? Sure. Have a look at the following thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=64966
 
Thanks to everyone who has replied to my question, the answers have been very insightful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
939
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K