Will a Sphere Roll or Slide on an Inclined Plane?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a sphere on an inclined plane, specifically whether it will roll or slide depending on various factors such as friction, angle of inclination, and initial conditions. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to dynamics and friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the sphere will have angular acceleration due to friction, and question the conditions under which it will slide if the limiting friction is less than the gravitational component along the incline.
  • Others argue that in the case of a frictionless slope, a ball will not roll due to the absence of net torque.
  • A participant notes that the required static friction for rolling without slipping depends on the angle, and if the maximum static friction is insufficient to create the needed torque, the sphere will slide as well as roll.
  • One participant suggests simplifying the problem by assuming static and dynamic friction are the same and independent of speed, discussing how various factors like angular inertia and initial velocity affect the transition from sliding to rolling.
  • Another participant mentions using the Lagrangian formulation to analyze the simultaneous rolling and sliding of the ball, indicating the complexity of the problem.
  • A participant provides a detailed mathematical analysis involving forces and energy equations, concluding that the ball will slide if a specific relationship involving the angle and coefficient of friction is met.
  • Another participant humorously refers to the result of the analysis as a "SAG" (silly guess), indicating a light-hearted acknowledgment of the uncertainty in their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the conditions for rolling versus sliding, and the discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the definitive behavior of the sphere under the given conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about friction being constant, the dependence on the angle of inclination, and the complexity of the dynamics involved in the transition from sliding to rolling.

fobos3
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
If we have an inclined plane at angle \alpha and a sphere on that plane it will have angular acceleration due to the friction force. If F_{lim}<mg\sin \alpha , where F_{lim} is the limiting friction will the sphere also slide along the plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this is basically the same question as "will a ball roll down a frictionless slope", which I believe is asked here many many times. If you have a frictionless slope and you release a ball, it will not roll, since there is no net torque.
 
fobos3 said:
If we have an inclined plane at angle \alpha and a sphere on that plane it will have angular acceleration due to the friction force.
Yes. And the required static friction for rolling without slipping depends on the angle. And the maximum available static friction also depends on the angle and the coefficient of friction.
If F_{lim}<mg\sin \alpha , where F_{lim} is the limiting friction will the sphere also slide along the plane?
That's not the exact relationship, but your overall idea is correct. If the maximum available static friction is insufficient to create the needed torque, the sphere will slide as well as roll. (I think that's what you are getting at.)
 
To simplify things you could assume that static and dynamic friction are the same and independent of speed. Assuming that friction force is less than mg sin(theta), and an experiment that operates in a vacuum, then the rate of both linear and angular acceleration would be linear. If the friction force equals mg sin(theta), with an initial linear velocity, the linear velocity would remain constant, but there would a be a constant rate of angular acceleration (until the sphere started rolling in which case both linear and angular acceleration would occur due to the reduced opposing friction force once the sphere starts rolling).

Depending on angular inertia, initial velocity, and coefficient of dynamic friction, if the rate of angular acceleration times radius is greater than the rate of linear acceleration, eventually the sphere starts rolling without sliding. Take the simple case of a sphere sliding from a frictionless horizontal plane to a non-frictionless horizontal plane. Then angle the plane until it reaches the point where tan(theta) = coefficient of dynamic friction where the ball slides at constant speed but increases angular velocity until it starts rolling. Once tan(theta) > coefficient of dynamic friction, then both linear and angular velocity increase and if angular inertia and/or angle of plane is high enough (all the mass at the surface of the sphere, like a ping pong ball), the sphere may never transition into rolling.
 
Last edited:
The only way I know to deal with the simultaneously rolling and sliding ball down an inclined plane is to use the Lagrangian formulation. It's non-trivial.
 
Ok, let's give it a try.
If the slope angle is theta, the force along the slope is
Fs= mg sin (theta)
The force perpendicular to the slope is
Fperp= mg cos(theta)
If the coefficient of friction is Cf, then the max uphill force due to torque before slipping is
Ftorque = Cf mg cos(theta)
If the mass were a point then the total kinetic energy is
-mgh = 1/2 m v2, where h = starting elevation. But because the moment of inertia of the ball is
I = (2/5) m R2, so then the total energy is
- mgh = (7/10) m v2
So there is an opposing frictional force slowing down the acceleration. By equating the two equations, the actual (effective) downhill acceleration force is F = 5/7 mg sin (theta). Thus there must be an uphill frictional (opposite to mg sin(theta)) force
Fuphill= (2/7) mg sin(theta)
So the ball will slide if (2/7) mg sin(theta) > Cf mg cos(theta)
or if
tan(theta) > (7/2) Cf.
This is a WAG (wild *** guess).
 
Ya. i got the same result. 7/2 Cf. So it's a SAG rather. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
740
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K