Will all four jets produce fountains at the same height?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of water jets produced from a garden hose system under different configurations and pressures. Participants explore the implications of friction and flow dynamics in both theoretical and practical scenarios, including comparisons between a linear hose setup and a sprinkler system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario with a 40' garden hose and questions whether all four jets would produce fountains at the same height under 30 psi pressure.
  • Another participant emphasizes that neglecting friction leads to different outcomes, suggesting that including it is essential for practical applications.
  • A participant argues that while friction can be modeled as negligible, in reality, the height of the jets would decrease from the first to the last due to flow dynamics.
  • It is noted that if each jet were the size of a pinhole, they might reach similar heights, but larger holes would result in more pronounced differences in jet height.
  • One participant asserts that ignoring friction does not yield practically useful solutions, as real-world scenarios would show progressively shorter jets downstream.
  • A participant shares a real-world irrigation issue faced by a friend, highlighting the complexities of pressure and flow in practical watering systems.
  • Another participant mentions that flow rates can drop significantly in smaller bore pipes with multiple branches, suggesting the need for proper manifolds or tanks to manage flow effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of friction in the analysis of water jet heights. While some argue that neglecting friction simplifies the problem, others contend that it is essential for understanding real-world applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practical implications of the theoretical models presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about friction being negligible, the dependence on specific hose sizes, and the lack of detailed mathematical modeling in the examples provided. The discussion does not resolve the complexities introduced by real-world variables.

solarblast
Messages
146
Reaction score
2
Suppose I have say a 40' long 3/4" garden hose stretched out linearly on a level surface. One end is attached to a faucet with maybe 30 psi. At 10', 20', 30', and 40' there are small vertical pipes from which will shoot water when the faucet is turned on. The end of the hose is capped. There's no friction in the hose. Will all four jets produce fountains at the same height? Suppose instead I had a faucet with circular attachment to which I could insert four 10' hoses with a jet at the end. Using the same pressure, would the jets be as high as the first example?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no friction in the hose.

But you have entitled this 'Practical...'

:confused:
 
Including friction (which is, of course, practical) produces a very different answer from neglecting it.
 
It is practical. It came about because a friend had a lawn problem similar to the first example. I happen to have a lawn sprinkler somewhat like the second example, and was curious about the distribution of water. Shrinking the problem to its barest form sometimes leads to insight for the real problem.
 
solarblast said:
It is practical. It came about because a friend had a lawn problem similar to the first example. I happen to have a lawn sprinkler somewhat like the second example, and was curious about the distribution of water. Shrinking the problem to its barest form sometimes leads to insight for the real problem.

Sometimes but not always.
One could model the friction to a very low, negligable value by substiuting a large enough hose so that the velocity of the water in the hose is practicly reduced to zero. But then you would not have a garden hose anymore, but maybe something closer to the size of a fire hose or larger. In which case all 4 jets would rise to the same height.

With a real garden hose the height of the jets would diminish from the first to the last. Depending upon the amount of water flow from each jet, the last could become a mere trickle..

In other words if each jet was the size of a pinhole in the garden hose, all jets should reach the same approximate height. As the size of the hole increases, the difference in height of each jet will become more pronounced from first to last.
 
It isn't practical because it doesn't give a solution that is practically useful. Ignoring friction would say that in your first example, the jets would all be the same height. However, if you look at the situation in reality, they would not be the same height but instead would get progressively shorter as you go downstream.

For the second situation, without friction they would all be the same height (nominally) as the fountains from the original example. In real life, they would all be approximately the same height as the first jet from the first example minus a little slop from the pressure loss due to friction in your manifold you describe.

So in short, it absolutely matters if you include friction. Without friction, this particular problem is not practical at all since it doesn't answer the fundamental questions you have correctly.
 
What spawned this question was a friend who lives 150 miles from here. He had landscapers put in a watering system for his backyard, about 40x80'. It had four stations, sprinkler valves, put around the area. His psi was measured at 86(!). When all four stations were turned on, the arrangement was insufficient. It did not cover the area well. He called the city to see if they agreed that it should do the job. Yes, he had more than enough pressure. 3/4" underground pipes. It was finally resolved by pairing up to stations for one time of the day, and other pair for another part of the day.

Nevertheless, he was curious why such a high psi failed to water simultaneously. The landscapers and the city fellow had no idea. The first abstract example was intended to provide some reasonable insight into the answer. Is there an answer provided by some physics model?

BTW, I once had an irrigation problem for an area probably 4 times bigger than his area. I took the problem h/w store, and in about 20-30 min, the h/w store guy figured out adequate sizes for it, and used handbooks on flow, pipes, friction and pressure to work it out--successfully.
 
Folks are often suprised how quickly the flow rate drops off in small(ish) bore pipes, even with high pressure, when you have multiple branches.
You need proper manifolds or tanks for this, which provide the necessary buffering, or pumps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
12K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
26K
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
31K