I Will every object in the universe evaporate?

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
Will every object in the universe evaporate?
According to a recent paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18521) (explained here: https://www.ru.nl/en/research/resea...verything-will-evaporate-not-only-black-holes) every massive object in the universe will evaporate in a similar way into Black Holes through Hawking radiation.

I've seen some critical comments (https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07628) to the paper indicating that it's wrong in many aspects, but the authors do not seem convinced (https://inspirehep.net/literature/2690645) of these critics

Therefore, even if the authors are correct and the paper is right, would all objects in the universe evaporate? Would there be any way to avoid it? Would even individual massive particles "evaporate"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to this is the same as the answer to all the other threads you have posted asking the same basic question. All of this is speculation; we have no theory of quantum gravity and we have no expectation of getting any evidence about quantum aspects of gravity any time soon. So the question you are asking is unanswerable.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Motore, Doc Al and Vanadium 50
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top