Will the Bug Reach the Other End of the Rubber Band?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a mathematical problem involving a bug on an infinitely stretchable rubber band, which is being pulled away from a wall at a rate of 1 m/s while the bug crawls towards the other end at 0.001 cm/s. A novel approach is proposed to analyze the situation using a "stretching" frame, leading to a derived equation that describes the bug's position over time. The user attempts to solve a differential equation that models the bug's movement relative to the band’s length, seeking clarification on the general solution to this equation. The conversation concludes with the realization that there is indeed a general solution to the differential equation presented.
gabee
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://www.feynmanlectures.info/exercises/bug_on_band.html

bug.gif


An infinitely stretchable rubber band has one end nailed to a wall, while the other end is pulled away from the wall at the rate of 1 m/s; initially the band is 1 meter long. A bug on the rubber band, initially near the wall end, is crawling toward the other end at the rate of 0.001 cm/s. Will the bug ever reach the other end? If so, when?

Homework Equations


Differential ones!

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved this one in what I think is a sort of novel way. I imagine that we are viewing the situation in a "stretching" frame--as if we view the stretching band with a camera and we continuously zoom out to keep the image of the band on the film exactly 1 meter wide. Then, the velocity of the bug on the film is described by

v_{bug\,in\,frame} = \frac{l_0}{l} v_{bug\,0}

where l_0 is the initial length of the band, l is the length of the band as a function of time, and v_{bug\,0} is the initial velocity of the bug as seen on the film (which is the same as the real velocity, 1E-5 m/s).

In effect, the 'image on the film' becomes a representation for the fraction of the band traversed by the bug.

So, using the information given in the problem, this equation becomes

v_{bug\,in\,frame} = \frac{1}{1+t} 1 \times 10^{-5}

which we can integrate with respect to time to find the x position of the bug on the film:

\int v\,dt = \int \frac{1}{1+t} 1 \times 10^{-5}\,dt

x = 1 \times 10^{-5} \ln(1+t)

When x = 1, the bug has reached the end of the band:

1 = 1 \times 10^{-5} ln(1+t), and with a little algebra,

t = e^{100000} - 1.
My original plan, however, was to use the following differential equation to describe the actual distance of the bug from the wall:

\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{x}{l} v_{end} + v_{bug}

where l (which is 1+t) is a function of t that describes the length of the band, v_{end} is the velocity of the end of the band (dl/dt=1 m/s) and v_{bug} is the velocity of the bug by itself (1E-5 m/s). But I didn't know how to solve this differential equation (I haven't taken a diff eq course yet and separation of variables won't work). I'm wondering--is there a general solution to this form of DE?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I can solve it, providing I have understood what you wrote in the right way.

This is what I think your differential equation is:
\frac{dx}{dt} - \frac{x}{1+t} = 1 \times 10^{-5}

This is a differential equation of the form
\frac{dx}{dt} + P x = Q

where P and Q are functions of t.

The way to solve this is as follows. Notice that, if we multiply through by \frac{1}{1+t}, we will end up with

\frac{1}{1+t} \frac{dx}{dt} - \frac{x}{(1+t)^2} = \frac{1 \times 10^{-5}}{1 + t}

The LHS of this equation is what you get when you differentiate \frac{x}{1+t} w.r.t. t. So you can then write

\frac{x}{1 + t} = \int \frac{1 \times 10^{-5}}{1+t} dt

Which I think you can finish off from there. So if I have understood your original equation correctly, there is a general solution.
 
Ah, beautiful. Thanks a lot dt19!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
468
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K