Wind turbine, conceptual question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the design of wind turbine blades, specifically questioning why they are typically thin rather than broader like those of electric fans or pinwheels. Participants explore the implications of blade shape on efficiency, energy capture, and airflow dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the efficiency of thin blades, suggesting that broader blades might capture more wind due to increased surface area.
  • Another participant introduces the idea of a trade-off between maximizing the mass of air flowing through the turbine and minimizing obstruction, which could slow down airflow and reduce energy extraction.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the design is an optimization problem, where maintaining a maximum mass flow rate while reducing outflow velocity is crucial, referencing the Betz limit as a relevant concept.
  • Another participant discusses the relationship between blade shape and kinetic energy change, arguing that long, skinny blades are more efficient for energy generation compared to wider blades, which may waste surface area.
  • It is noted that for small wings at low speeds, wider blades may be more efficient due to considerations like Reynolds Number, which complicates the generalization of blade design efficiency.
  • One participant highlights that the primary goal of wind turbines is power generation rather than force generation, linking the efficiency of long, thin blades to their ability to increase the average speed of the blades due to a larger radius.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there are trade-offs involved in blade design, but multiple competing views on the optimal shape and its implications for efficiency remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about airflow dynamics and energy extraction that may depend on specific conditions or definitions, which are not fully explored or resolved.

mikelepore
Messages
550
Reaction score
2
For years I have been wondering why wind turbines are designed with very skinny blades (photo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Turbine_aalborg.jpg ). Most of the available wind passes right through the circular "reach" of the device without touching the blades. Wouldn't it be more efficient if the blades were shaped something like those of a typical electric fan (photo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Electric_Fan_720x1070.jpg ), or a pinwheel toy (photo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Green_pinwheel.jpg ) ? I would have assumed that the objective would be to maximize the surface area to capture as much wind as possible. I note that the sail of a sailboat is given a shape to produce a lot of surface area. I note that expressions for flux (light, electric, magnetic) are proportional to intensity multiplied by surface area. Can anyone please explain this design shape to me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a trade-off: you also want to maximise the mass of air going through the turbine. Too much obstruction and the through-flow slows down (more air bypasses around instead) and less energy can be extracted. Also consider how fast the skinny blades can move across the wind.
 
Like Cesiumfrog stated, there is a trade off. Its really an optimization problem to reduce the velocity of the out flowing air as much as possible while maintaining a maximum mass flow rate. This can not be done with wide blades. This phenomenon can be described with Betz limit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betz'_law
 
Part of the overhead with an airfoil is the change in kinetic energy of a wind. By diverting more air at a slower speed, you get the same force (momentum related) but with less work done on the air (less kinetic energy change). It turns out that using long, "skinny" (high aspect ratio) wings is more efficient, than fat short ones. If the goal is to only divert a large amount of air a small amount, then a "fat" wing doesn't help since it's just wasted surface area because of the small amount of diversion.

One exception is for small wings at slow speeds, the wind speed times chord length called Reynolds Number becomes an issue and lower aspect ratio ("fatter") wings are used on small, slow speed model gliders for maximum efficiency. For contest models, the wing spans are limited by rules (1.5 meter, 2 meter, unlimite (usually 3 to 4 meters)), and the 1.5 meter models have low aspect ratios compared to the 3 meter and larger models.

Unlike a wing, the goal of a wind turbine is to generate power, not force, efficiently. However power = force x speed, and long thin blades increase the average "speed" of the blades because of the larger radius.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K