Wire loop in magnetic field of the long magnet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the torque of a wire loop (ABCD) placed in the magnetic field of a long thin rod magnet with a magnetic moment per unit volume of ##\mathfrak{M}_0##. The north pole of the magnet is positioned at the center of the loop, and the current I flows along the sides of the circuit. The torque is derived using the Ampere Force and integration, leading to the conclusion that the correct torque is ##M = 4 I \mathfrak{M}_0 S##. Participants emphasized the importance of considering the direction of torque and integrating the angles between the current and radius vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields and magnetic moments
  • Familiarity with Ampere's Law and torque calculations
  • Knowledge of Stokes' theorem in vector calculus
  • Ability to perform vector integration in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of torque in magnetic fields using vector calculus
  • Learn about the application of Stokes' theorem in electromagnetism
  • Explore the concept of magnetic monopoles and their implications
  • Investigate the relationship between current loops and magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electromagnetism and torque calculations in magnetic fields.

sergiokapone
Messages
306
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement



The wire loop ##ABCD## is in a magnetic field of the long thin rod magnet with a magnetic moment per unit volume of ##\mathfrak{M}_0## and a cross section ##S##. The north pole of this magnet is in the center of the loop, and the magnet is perpendicular to the plane of the loop. Emf is connected to the opposite edges of the diagonal ##AC## , thus the current I is flow along sides of the circuit. Find the torque of force couple M and its direction.
RINbkm.png

Homework Equations


[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



The magnet field of the long magnet near the north pole one can represent as magnetic field of monopole
\begin{equation}
H = \frac{q_m}{r^2}
\end{equation}




where ##q_m## -- effective magnetic charge, which one can find from definition of magnetic momentum ##p_m = q_ml##:
\begin{equation*}
q_ml = \mathfrak{M}_0 S l
\end{equation*}
thus, the effective magnetic charge is
\begin{equation}
q_m = \mathfrak{M}_0 S.
\end{equation}

The Ampere Force acting on sides of wire loop:
\begin{equation}
dF = Idl H \sin\alpha,
\end{equation}
And, so the torque is
\begin{equation}
M = \int rdF = I\mathfrak{M}_0 S \int \frac{\sin\alpha}{r} dl
\end{equation}
from the geometry ##dl\sin\alpha = r d\alpha##, thus


\begin{equation}
M = \int rdF = I\mathfrak{M}_0 S 4 \frac{\pi}{2}
\end{equation}

The answer in the problems book is
\begin{equation}
M = \int rdF = 4 I\mathfrak{M}_0 S
\end{equation}

Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you haven't taken into account the direction of the torque, ##\vec{dM} = \vec{r} \times \vec{dF}##, for each element of current ##dl##.
 
Illustration for solution
7ddd46eb6fdde2e4d797ac0dc78bcaff.png
 
Last edited:
Ok,I lost sight of that, thanks. In the process of integration one will have to take into account the changes in the angles between the current and the radius vector, and count the direction of torque also. Tedious way.
18e2ea1d115014afb6e8ba6d54eae9eb.png

Is there a more general way? (I mean using only vectors)
May be, an easier way:
\begin{equation}
\vec M = I \oint \vec{dl} (\vec B \cdot \vec r) - \vec B (\vec r \cdot \vec{dl}).
\end{equation}

But following using Stokes' theorem ##I \oint_L \vec{dl} =I \int_S \vec{dS} \times \nabla## I get zero.
 
Last edited:
If you look at all the torque elements, you can see that the net torque vector is in a certain direction. So, you can just sum the torque components in that direction.
 

Attachments

  • Torque on current square 2.png
    Torque on current square 2.png
    7.4 KB · Views: 496

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K